The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Strategies and Challenges to Changing the Focus of Assessment and Instruction in Science Classrooms
Abstract
The improvement of science education in accord with the current science reform agenda requires the development of sophisticated instructional strategies that are grounded in a clear recognition of student understanding. We describe a pedagogical strategy, the assessment conversation, that helps teachers elicit student understanding and then use elicited and diverse student understanding as the instructional basis for achieving conceptual and reasoning goals in the classroom. We then illustrate the potential and challenges of using the assessment conversation through examples that have emerged from Science Education through Portfolio Instruction and Assessment (SEPIA), a project attempting to reform practices of assessment and instruction in middle school science classrooms. We conclude with a discussion of issues facing any substantial reform of science education.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Novak, J. D., Gowin, D. B., & Kahle, J. B. (1984) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173469 · Cited by 5,199
Professional Growth Among Preservice and Beginning Teachers
Kagan, D. M. (1992) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543062002129 · Cited by 1,960
Dual space search during scientific reasoning
Klahr, D., & Dunbar, K. (1988) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1201_1 · Cited by 1,058
The 1987 Presidential Address Learning In School and Out
Resnick, L. B. (1987) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x016009013 · Cited by 1,035
Cited by
Assessment and Classroom Learning
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998) · Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice · doi:10.1080/0969595980050102 · Cited by 8,152
Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: making science accessible to all students
White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1998) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1601_2 · Cited by 1,394
Supporting and Promoting Argumentation Discourse in Science Education
Duschl, R. A., & Osborne, J. (2002) · Studies in Science Education · doi:10.1080/03057260208560187 · Cited by 1,161
Self-citationReforming Science Teaching: What Research Says About Inquiry
Anderson, R. D. (2002) · Journal of Science Teacher Education · doi:10.1023/a:1015171124982 · Cited by 1,140
Discourse Patterns and Collaborative Scientific Reasoning in Peer and Teacher-Guided Discussions
Hogan, K., Nastasi, B. K., & Pressley, M. (1999) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1704_2 · Cited by 460
Metadata
- Authors
- Duschl, R. A., & Gitomer, D. H.
- Venue
- Educational Assessment
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1997-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 37-73
- ISSN
- 1062-7197 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-6977
- OpenAlex
- W1965290108
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 19.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Strategies and Challenges to Changing the Focus of Assessment and Instruction in Science Classrooms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s15326977ea0401_2
- The paper
- Duschl, R. A., & Gitomer, D. H. (1997). Strategies and Challenges to Changing the Focus of Assessment and Instruction in Science Classrooms. Educational Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326977ea0401_2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.