The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toward Teachers' Adaptive Metacognition
Abstract
In this article, we compare conventional uses of metacognition with the kinds of metacognition required by the teaching profession. We discover that many of problems and tasks used in successful metacognitive interventions tend to be reasonably well-defined problems of limited duration, with known solutions. Teaching has unique qualities that differentiate it from many of the tasks and environments that metacognitive interventions have supported. Teachers often confront highly variable situations. This led us to believe that successful teaching can benefit from what we call adaptive metacognition, which involves change to oneself and to one's environment, in response to a wide range of classroom social and instructional variability. We present several examples to illustrate the nature of metacognition required by teachers and the challenges of helping teachers recognize situations that require adaptive metacognition. We conclude the article by describing an approach, critical event-based instruction, which we have recently developed to help teachers appreciate the need for metacognitive adaptation by seeing the novelty in everyday recurrent classroom events.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry
Flavell, J. H. (1979) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.34.10.906 · Cited by 11,282 · cited 1×
“People tend to be more reflective around unexpected situations (Flavell, 1979).”
BackgroundThe Role of Goal Orientation in Self-Regulated Learning
Pintrich, P. R. (2000) · Handbook of Self-Regulation · doi:10.1016/b978-012109890-2/50043-3 · Cited by 5,173
Facilitating Elaborative Learning Through Guided Student-Generated Questioning
King, A. (1992) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2701_8 · Cited by 359
Metacognition and problem solving: A process-oriented approach.
Berardi-Coletta, B., Buyer, L. S., Dominowski, R. L., & Rellinger, E. R. (1995) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037//0278-7393.21.1.205 · Cited by 269
Cited by
Singer, S., & Smith, K. A. (2013) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20030 · Cited by 835
Chieu, V. M., Herbst, P., & Weiss, M. (2011) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1080/10508406.2011.528324 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Lin, X., Schwartz, D. L., & Hatano, G.
- Venue
- Educational Psychologist
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-09-01
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 245-255
- ISSN
- 0046-1520 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-6985
- OpenAlex
- W2007052376
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 9.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toward Teachers' Adaptive Metacognition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s15326985ep4004_6
- The paper
- Lin, X., Schwartz, D. L., & Hatano, G. (2005). Toward Teachers' Adaptive Metacognition. Educational Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4004_6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.