The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Socioanalytic Perspective on Job Performance
Abstract
This article presents a perspective on the relation between personality, job performance, and performance appraisal. The article is largely descriptive and discursive, but the key assumptions are primarily data-based. We begin by defining personality in terms of motivation, identity, and reputation-as opposed to traits. We then describe the role of social skills in allowing people successfully to pursue their major occupational goals. Finally, we suggest that performance appraisals reflect supervisors' judgments of rewardingness-the degree to which an incumbent meets or fulfills his or her boss's expectations regarding his or her performance-and these expectations may not necessarily concern the degree to which important organizational goals are met.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Emotional capabilities influence individual and/or team performance.
“Based on the authors we reviewed, in terms of performance based on a competency model, emotional capabilities were found to influence individual and/or team performance [41,77,87,88,118,130,142,152].”
From Emotional intelligence, leadership, and work teams: A hybrid literature review. (2023) · cites this paper as [77]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- Argyle, M. (1991).Cooperation: The basis of sociabiliry. New York: Routledge.
- Barkow, I. H. (1992). Beneathnew culture is old psychology.In I. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Ms.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 627437). New York: Oxford University Press.
- Barrick M. R., 1991, Personnel Psychology, 44, 1, 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x · DOI · Paper page
- Barrick M. R., 1993, Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 15
- 10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.187 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1207/s15327043hup1002_3 · DOI
- 10.1037//0021-9010.80.1.168 · DOI
- Day, D. V. & Silverman, (1989). Personality and job performance: Evidence of incremental validity.Personnel Psychology, 42.25-36. · DOI
- 10.1037//0021-9010.74.2.273 · DOI
- Hogan, R. (1983). A socioanalytic theory of personality.In M. Page (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 58-89). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
- Hogan, R. (1991). Personality and personality assessment.In M. D. Dunnette & L. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 873-919). Chicago: Rand McNally.
- Hogan, R. (1996). A socioanalytic interpretation of the Five-Factor Model.In J. Wiggins (Ed.), The Five-Factor model ofpersonality (pp. 163-179). New York: Guilford.
- Holland, J. L. (1985). Making vocational chorces: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Hough, L. M (1997, August). Personality variables and predicoon of job performance. The nature of the taxonomies makes a difference.In J. Collins (Chair), Which trait theoty should psychologtsts adopt and why? Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the American Psycholog~cal Association, Chicago.
- 10.1037//0033-2909.107.1.34 · DOI · Paper page
- MacKinnon D. W., 1944, In J. McV. Hunt (Ed.), Personality and the behavior disorders (Vol., 1, 4
- McClelland D. C., 1976, HarvardBusrness Revrew, 54, 100
- Mead, G. H. (1932).Mind, sefj, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- 10.1037//0021-9010.79.4.475 · DOI
- Neisser, U. & Winograd, E. (1988). Remembering reconsidered.Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press · DOI
- 10.1037//0021-9010.78.4.679 · DOI
- Tett R. P., 1991, Personnel Psychology, 44, 703, 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00696.x · DOI
- Wiggins, J. S. & Trapnell, P. D. (1996). A dyadic-intwaaional perspective on the Five-Factor model.In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The Five-Factor nwdel ofper.sonality. Theoreticalperspectives (pp. 88-162) New York: Guilford.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Emotional intelligence, leadership, and work teams: A hybrid literature review.
Coronado-Maldonado, I., & Benítez-Márquez, M.-D. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20356 · Cited by 449
Metadata
- Authors
- Hogan, R., & Shelton, D.
- Venue
- Human Performance
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1998-06-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 129-144
- ISSN
- 0895-9285 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2093978642
- Cited by
- 364
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 12.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Human Performance (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Management
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Keywords
- employee performance, personality, performance evaluation (human resources), motivation, identity, reputation, social skills, occupational goals, supervisor expectations, organizational goals
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
