The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predicting Adaptive Performance: Further Tests of a Model of Adaptability
Abstract
This research further investigates an 8-dimension taxonomy of adaptive performance developed by Pulakos, Arad, Donovan, and Plamondon (2000) and the usefulness of past experience, interest, and self-efficacy predictors developed to measure these same 8 dimensions for predicting adaptive job performance. Participants in the concurrent, criterion-related validation study included 739 military personnel. They completed the 3 adaptability measures as well as more traditional cognitive and noncognitive predictors. Supervisors of the study participants rated their adaptive job performance. Results showed support for the 8-dimension model of adaptability. In addition, cognitive ability, personality, and the new adaptability predictors were shown to predict adaptive performance, with some past experience items adding incremental validity beyond the more traditional cognitive ability and personality measures. Results are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYSIS
BARRICK, M. R., & MOUNT, M. K. (1991) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x · Cited by 8,689
Motivational processes affecting learning.
Dweck, C. S. (1986) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.41.10.1040 · Cited by 6,971
An Introduction to the Five‐Factor Model and Its Applications
McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00970.x · Cited by 6,835
Adaptability in the workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance.
Pulakos, E. D., Arad, S., Donovan, M. A., & Plamondon, K. E. (2000) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.85.4.612 · Cited by 1,891
Self-citationToward a theory of cognitive aptitude for learning from instruction.
Snow, R. E., & Lohman, D. F. (1984) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-0663.76.3.347 · Cited by 327
Functional flexibility: A new conception of interpersonal flexibility.
Paulhus, D. L., & Martin, C. L. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.55.1.88 · Cited by 223
Progress Self-Monitoring: Effects on Children’s Self-Efficacy and Achievement
Schunk, D. H. (1982) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.1080/00220973.1982.11011845 · Cited by 165
Cited by
Adaptive Performance: A New Scale to Measure Individual Performance in Organizations
Charbonnier‐Voirin, A., & Roussel, P. (2012) · Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration · doi:10.1002/cjas.232 · Cited by 304
VAN IDDEKINGE, C. H., & PLOYHART, R. E. (2008) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00133.x · Cited by 101
Navigating the maze: the effects of algorithmic management on employee performance
Liu, M., Lan, Y., Liu, Z., Liu, M., & Xia, Y. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-03453-z · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Pulakos, E. D., Schmitt, N., Dorsey, D. W., Arad, S., Borman, W. C., & Hedge, J. W.
- Venue
- Human Performance
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2002-09
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 299-323
- ISSN
- 0895-9285 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7043
- OpenAlex
- W2078626329
- Cited by
- 444
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 6.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predicting Adaptive Performance: Further Tests of a Model of Adaptability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s15327043hup1504_01
- The paper
- Pulakos, E. D., Schmitt, N., Dorsey, D. W., Arad, S., Borman, W. C., & Hedge, J. W. (2002). Predicting Adaptive Performance: Further Tests of a Model of Adaptability. Human Performance. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1504_01
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
