Cited by 223Personality Traits and PsychologyPsychological Testing and AssessmentSocial Skills and Education

Functional flexibility: A new conception of interpersonal flexibility.

Paulhus, Delroy L., Martin, Carol L.·1988·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Traditional conceptions of interpersonal flexibility emphasize two critical components: (a) a widerange of interpersonal responses and (b) situational appropriateness. Most current measures arebased on standard trait ratings, which cannot address situational adjustment. In place of trait ratings,we suggest the use of capability ratings, that is, self-reports of the ease of performing social behaviorswhen required by the situation. Our proposed index of flexibility, the Functional Flexibility Index(FFI), is the composite of 16 interpersonal capabilities. In Study 1, factor analyses indicated that theFFI is distinct from other widely used flexibility measures. Study 2 supported the validity of the FFTby showing substantial correlations with peer ratings of interpersonal flexibility. In Studies 3 and 4,the FFI outperformed other flexibility measures in predicting adjustment. Another form of interper-sonal variability, situationality, is the tendency to view one's personality as being dependent on thesituation. Situational individuals reported lower self-esteem than nonsituational individuals. Mea-sures of functional flexibility and situationality were found to be orthogonal.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.55.1.88

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Interpersonal flexibility, a personality trait capturing the ability to alter behavior in different social situations and flexibly use a variety of behaviors, heightens leaders' behavioral flexibility.

    “Another characteristic that heightens leaders' behavioral flexibility is their interpersonal flexibility, a personality trait that captures the ability to alter behavior in different social situations and to flexibly use a variety of behaviors in different situations”

    From Leading diversity: Towards a theory of functional leadership in diverse teams. (2020) · cites this paper as Paulhus & Martin, 1988

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Paulhus, D. L., & Martin, C. L.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1988-07
Volume
55
Issue
1
Pages
88-101
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2006407819
Cited by
223
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 13
FWCI
8.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Education › Social Skills and Education
Keywords
interpersonal flexibility, functional flexibility, situationality, self-esteem, peer ratings, personality adjustment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review