The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Borderline Issues: Social and Material Aspects of Design
Abstract
The shared use of artifacts is, we argue, supported by latent border resources, which lie beyond what is usually recognized as the canonical artifact. These unnoticed resources are developed over time as artifacts are integrated into ongoing practice and stable conventions or genres grow up around them. For a couple of reasons, these resources may now deserve increased attention. First, because they lie outside conventional frames of reference, many new designs and design strategies inadvertently threaten to remove resources on which users rely. Second, because of the increasingly rapid proliferation of new technologies, users have less time to develop new border resources. Consequently, we suggest, designers now need to understand more fully the role border resources play and to work more directly to help users develop them. Meeting these goals will require more than an intensification of user-centered design. It will require a fundamental redirection of the way many designers look at both artifacts and users.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 35,324
The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective
(1986) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511819582 · Cited by 6,267
Sweetness and power : the place of sugar in modern history
Roxborough, I., & Mintz, S. W. (1986) · Man · doi:10.2307/2803144 · Cited by 1,769
Cited by
Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large information spaces
Star, S. L., & Ruhleder, K. (1996) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.7.1.111 · Cited by 3,238
Morrison, C., Cutrell, E., Dhareshwar, A., Doherty, K., Thieme, A., & Taylor, A. (2017) · Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility · doi:10.1145/3132525.3132530 · Cited by 69
Lest we remember: Organizational forgetting and the production of knowledge
Bowker, G. C. (1997) · Accounting, Management and Information Technologies · doi:10.1016/s0959-8022(97)90001-1 · Cited by 68
Information literacy as situated and distributed activity
Lipponen, L. (2010) · Practising Information Literacy · doi:10.1016/b978-1-876938-79-6.50003-0 · Cited by 30
Capturing the Context of Use to Inform System Design
Evenson, S., Muller, M., & Roth, E. M. (2008) · Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making · doi:10.1518/155534308x377072 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P.
- Venue
- Human-Computer Interaction
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1994-03-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-36
- ISSN
- 0737-0024 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2138246975
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 16.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
