Cited by 68Organizational Learning and LeadershipManagement and Organizational StudiesInnovation and Knowledge Management

Lest we remember: Organizational forgetting and the production of knowledge

Bowker, Geoffrey C.·1997·Accounting, Management and Information Technologies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0959-8022(97)90001-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bowker, G. C.
Corresponding author
Bowker, Geoffrey C.
Venue
Accounting, Management and Information Technologies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-07
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
113-138
ISSN
0959-8022 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2050120382
Cited by
68
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
9.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Accounting Management and Information Technologies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Learning and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
Keywords
organizational forgetting, knowledge production, institutional memory, knowledge management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review