The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Beyond Usability Evaluation: Analysis of Human-Robot Interaction at a Major Robotics Competition
Abstract
Human-robot interaction (HRI) is a relatively new field of study. To date, most of the effort in robotics has been spent in developing hardware and software that expands the range of robot functionality and autonomy. In contrast, little effort has been spent so far to ensure that the robotic displays and interaction controls are intuitive for humans. This study applied robotics, human-computer interaction (HCI), and computer-supported cooperative work (CSCW) expertise to gain experience with HCI/CSCW evaluation techniques in the robotics domain. As a case study for this article, we analyzed four different robot systems that competed in the 2002 American Association for Artificial Intelligence Robot Rescue Competition. These systems completed urban search and rescue tasks in a controlled environment with predetermined scoring rules that provided objective measures of success. This study analyzed pre-evaluation questionnaires; videotapes of the robots, interfaces, and operators; maps of the robots' paths through the competition arena; post-evaluation debriefings; and critical incidents (e.g., when the robots damaged the test arena). As a result, this study developed guidelines for developing interfaces for HRI.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/5657.001.0001 · Cited by 3,537
The Usability Engineering Lifecycle
NIELSEN, J. (1993) · Usability Engineering · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-052029-2.50007-3 · Cited by 2,657
Enhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristics
Nielsen, J. (1994) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/191666.191729 · Cited by 1,439
Cited by
Human–Robot Interaction: A Survey
Goodrich, M. A., & Schultz, A. C. (2008) · Foundations and Trends® in Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1561/1100000005 · Cited by 1,541
Common metrics for human-robot interaction
Steinfeld, A., Fong, T., Kaber, D., Lewis, M., Scholtz, J., Schultz, A., & Goodrich, M. (2006) · Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on Human-robot interaction · doi:10.1145/1121241.1121249 · Cited by 756
Self-citationHuman-Robot Collaboration: A Literature Review and Augmented Reality Approach in Design
Green, S. A., Billinghurst, M., Chen, X., & Chase, J. G. (2008) · International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems · doi:10.5772/5664 · Cited by 306
"Where am i?" acquiring situation awareness using a remote robot platform
Yanco, H. A., & Drury, J. (2005) · 2004 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37583) · doi:10.1109/icsmc.2004.1400762 · Cited by 163
Self-citation(2009) · doi:10.1075/is.10.3.06wis · Cited by 124
Metadata
- Authors
- Yanco, H., Drury, J., & Scholtz, J.
- Venue
- Human-Computer Interaction
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-06-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 117-149
- ISSN
- 0737-0024 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2145820695
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 30.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Beyond Usability Evaluation: Analysis of Human-Robot Interaction at a Major Robotics Competition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s15327051hci1901&2_6
- The paper
- Yanco, H., Drury, J., & Scholtz, J. (2004). Beyond Usability Evaluation: Analysis of Human-Robot Interaction at a Major Robotics Competition. Human-Computer Interaction. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci1901%262_6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.