The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Corporate Social Responsibility Practices, Corporate Identity, and Purchase Intention: A Dual-Process Model
Abstract
The relationships among corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices, corporate identity, and purchase intention were evaluated for 4 corporations: Microsoft, Nike, Philip Morris, and Wendy's. Discretionary CSR practices and moral/ethical CSR practices emerged as significant predictors of the corporate social values dimension of identity. Relational CSR practices, however, contributed mainly to the expertise dimension of corporate identity. Also, familiarity with CSR practices of a corporation had a significant effect on corporate identity, which in turn affected purchase intention. For 2 of the 4 companies, Nike and Wendy's, both corporate expertise and corporate social values were significant predictors of purchase intention. For Microsoft, only the expertise dimension was predictive of purchase intention, whereas for Philip Morris, only the corporate social values dimension was a significant predictor of purchase intention. The results are interpreted within a dual-process model of corporate identity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance
Carroll, A. B. (1979) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257850 · Cited by 10,480
Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility
Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.38.2.225.18838 · Cited by 4,659
Charitable programs and the retailer: do they mix?
Ellen, P. S., Mohr, L. A., & Webb, D. J. (2000) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/s0022-4359(00)00032-4 · Cited by 809
Cited by
Peloza, J., & Shang, J. (2011) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-010-0213-6 · Cited by 1,076
Islam, T., Islam, R., Pitafi, A. H., Xiaobei, L., Rehmani, M., Irfan, M., & Mubarak, M. S. (2021) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2020.07.019 · Cited by 623
Study on the Relationship between CSR and Financial Performance
Cho, S. J., Chung, C. Y., & Young, J. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11020343 · Cited by 490
Corporate Sociopolitical Activism and Firm Value
Bhagwat, Y., Warren, N. L., Beck, J. T., & Watson, G. F. (2020) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/0022242920937000 · Cited by 473
Consumer's response to CSR activities: Mediating role of brand image and brand attitude
Ramesh, K., Saha, R., Goswami, S., Sekar, & Dahiya, R. (2019) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.1689 · Cited by 312
Metadata
- Authors
- David, P., Kline, S., & Dai, Y.
- Venue
- Journal of Public Relations Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-07
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 291-313
- ISSN
- 1062-726X (ISSN-L)
- 1532-754X
- OpenAlex
- W2006221623
- Cited by
- 430
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 24.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Corporate Social Responsibility Practices, Corporate Identity, and Purchase Intention: A Dual-Process Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s1532754xjprr1703_4
- The paper
- David, P., Kline, S., & Dai, Y. (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility Practices, Corporate Identity, and Purchase Intention: A Dual-Process Model. Journal of Public Relations Research. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr1703_4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.