The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Authoritarianism, Religious Fundamentalism, Quest, and Prejudice
Abstract
Five studies of university students and their parents were carried out to investigate the relationships among right-wing authoritarianism, various indices of religious orientation, and prejudice. Measures of religious fundamentalism, and religious quest, developed for this research, proved to be psychometrically sound, and were good discriminators between prejudiced and unprejudiced persons, across a variety of different measures of prejudice and authoritarian aggression. Scores on both Religious Fundamentalism and Religious Quest scales also were correlated strongly with right-wing authoritarianism and the Christian Orthodoxy scale, although orthodoxy itself tended not to be correlated with prejudice. Apparently, religious fundamentalism and nonquesting are linked with authoritarianism and prejudice toward a wide variety of minority groups. Possible explanations for these relationships are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A validated intrinsic religious motivation scale
Hoge, R. (1972) · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion · doi:10.2307/1384677 · Cited by 704
Cited by
The Other “Authoritarian Personality”
Altemeyer, B. (1998) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60382-2 · Cited by 1,382
Self-citationTwo Decades of Terror Management Theory: A Meta-Analysis of Mortality Salience Research
Burke, B. L., Martens, A., & Faucher, E. H. (2010) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868309352321 · Cited by 1,188
Do you believe in atheists? Distrust is central to anti-atheist prejudice.
Gervais, W. M., Shariff, A. F., & Norenzayan, A. (2011) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0025882 · Cited by 495
A Terror Management Analysis of the Psychological Functions of Religion
Vail, K. E., Rothschild, Z. K., Weise, D. R., Solomon, S., Pyszczynski, T., & Greenberg, J. (2010) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868309351165 · Cited by 461
Prosocial Behavior and Religion: New Evidence Based on Projective Measures and Peer Ratings
SAROGLOU, V., PICHON, I., TROMPETTE, L., VERSCHUEREN, M., & DERNELLE, R. (2005) · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion · doi:10.1111/j.1468-5906.2005.00289.x · Cited by 449
Metadata
- Authors
- Altemeyer, B., & Hunsberger, B.
- Venue
- International Journal for the Psychology of Religion
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1992-04
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 113-133
- ISSN
- 1050-8619 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7582
- OpenAlex
- W1995938991
- Cited by
- 1,264
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Authoritarianism, Religious Fundamentalism, Quest, and Prejudice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s15327582ijpr0202_5
- The paper
- Altemeyer, B., & Hunsberger, B. (1992). Authoritarianism, Religious Fundamentalism, Quest, and Prejudice. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327582ijpr0202_5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
