Cited by 704Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyStudy and Philosophy of ReligionPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

A validated intrinsic religious motivation scale

Hoge, R.·1972·Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion

Abstract

Research on intrinsic and extrinsic religion has been troubled by conceptual diffuseness and questionable scale validity. Hunt and King have proposed greater specificity in conceptualization and measurement in future work. This paper attempts to specify and measure a single crucial dimension identified by Hunt and King, namely ultimate versus instrumental religious motivation. Two validation studies were done utilizing persons nominated by ministers as having either ultimate (intrinsic) or instrumental (extrinsic) religious motivation. A new 10-item Intrinsic Religious Motivation Scale is proposed, and measurement problems are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1384677

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • If someone provides Position 1 and 2 level responses on LAMP-C and responds 'Definitely not true' to the statement 'My religious beliefs are what really lie behind my whole approach to life' on the DUREL and Hoge scales, they probably cannot imagine a 'whole approach' to their life, since they perceive life as more concrete and episodic.

    “For example, if someone provides Position 1 and 2 level responses on LAMP-C and responds 'Definitely not true' to the statement 'My religious beliefs are what really lie behind my whole approach to life' found in both the DUREL and the Hoge scales, we might conclude that they probably cannot imagine a 'whole approach' to their life, since they perceive life as more concrete and episodic (Hoge 1972”
  • Scales like the 10-item Hoge scale on intrinsic religiosity or the DUREL could provide interpretable feedback on the observed correlation between LAMP-C and religious practice, affiliation, and belief.

    “Scales like the 10-item Hoge scale on intrinsic religiosity or the DUREL could provide interpretable feedback on the observed correlation (Hoge 1972; Koenig and Büssing 2010).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoge, R.
Corresponding author
Hoge, R.
Venue
Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1972-12
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
369
ISSN
0021-8294 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2335623894
Cited by
704
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 34
FWCI
3.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
intrinsic religiosity, scale validation, concept of religion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review