Cited by 124Human-Automation Interaction and SafetyEmotion and Mood RecognitionEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

Overview of the DARPA Augmented Cognition Technical Integration Experiment

St. John, Mark, Kobus, David A., Morrison, Jeffrey G., Schmorrow, Dylan·2004·International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction

Abstract

The Defense Advance Research Projects Agency Augmented Cognition program is developing innovative technologies that will transform human-computer interactions by making information systems adapt to the changing capabilities and limitations of the user. The first phase of the Augmented Cognition program was to empirically assess the ability of various psychophysiological measures to identify changes in human cognitive activity during task performance in real time. This overview describes the empirical results of a Technical Integration Experiment involving the evaluation of 20 psychophysiological measures from 11 different research groups, including functional Near Infrared imaging, continuous and event-related electrical encephalography, pupil dilation, mouse pressure, body posture, heart rate, and galvanic skin response. These "cognitive state gauges" were evaluated on a common, quasi-realistic, military command and control task called the Warship Commander Task. Participants monitored aircraft on a geographical display for their levels of threat and responded to the threatening ones, as they simultaneously monitored ship communications for ship status information. The task involves a combination of perceptual, motor, spatial, auditory, verbal, memory, and decision-making processing. Task load was manipulated by changing the quantity and types of aircraft appearing throughout the primary task and by varying the presence or absence of the secondary verbal-memory task. Eleven…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15327590ijhc1702_2

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • During handwriting with a stylus, velocity, frequency, trajectory duration, and pressure of strokes were studied as indicators for cognitive workload.

    “During handwriting with a stylus, the velocity [211,260], frequency [210], trajectory duration [209], and pressure of strokes [260] were studied as indicators for cognitive workload.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
St. John, M., Kobus, D. A., Morrison, J. G., & Schmorrow, D.
Venue
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
Published
2004-06
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
131-149
ISSN
  • 1044-7318 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7590
OpenAlex
W1984170582
Cited by
124
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
8.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction (publishedVersion)
  • Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Keywords
augmented cognition, psychophysiological measures, human-computer interaction, military command and control, workload, functional near-infrared spectroscopy, event-related potentials, EEG, pupil dilation, skin conductance, heart rate, human-machine systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review