Cited by 18

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Environmental Enrichment for New World Primates: Introducing Food-Irrelevant Objects and Direct and Secondary Effects

Renner, Michael J., Feiner, Adam J., Orr, Mark G., Delaney, Beth A.·2000·Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science

Abstract

This study examined methods of environmental enrichment for zoo animals for 4 New World primate species: pygmy and Geoffrey's marmosets (Cebuella pygmaea and Callithrix geoffroyi), red-bellied tamarins (Saguinus labiatus), and golden- headed lion tamarins (Leontopithecus chrysomelus). Subjects were housed in groups at the Philadelphia Zoo. Baseline behavioral time budget data were collected, and stimulus objects were then introduced in succession to each enclosure. Each object included multiple manipulable subcomponents. Time budget data were collected while objects were in the enclosures, and subjects' contacts with objects were videotaped. Overall time budgets were significantly altered in only the red-bellied tamarins, the least active of the species, solely due to a shift from social grooming to passive social contact; when categories were collapsed into broader categories, this effect disappeared. Object contact occurred within the 1st hr for all species and ranged over nearly 2 orders of magnitude, from approximately 10 sec per subject (red-bellied tamarins) to approximately 700 sec per subject (Geoffrey's marmosets). Habituation was not evident within any 1st hr of observation but was shown when 1st hr observations were compared with those from subsequent days. This article discusses implications for environmental enrichment in zoos.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15327604jaws0301_3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It could not be excluded that the greater interaction of the marmosets with the feeder was due to species differences in approaching the new enrichment devices.

    “However, it could not be excluded that the greater interaction of the marmosets with the feeder was due to species differences in approaching the new enrichment devices, as previously suggested (Renner et al., 2000).”

    From Gum feeder as environmental enrichment for zoo marmosets and tamarins (2020) · cites this paper as Renner et al., 2000

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Brinkman C., 1996, Laboratory Primate Newsletter, 35, 5
  2. Chamove, A. S. & Anderson, J. R. (1989). Examining environmental enrichment. In E. Segal (Ed.), The psychological well-being of primates (pp. 183-202). Philadelphia: Noyes.
  3. Glick-Bauer M., 1997, Laboratory Primate Newsletter, 36, 1
  4. Kleiman, D. G. (1978). The biology and conservation of the Callitrichidae. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institute Press.
  5. Line S. W., 1987, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 190, 854
  6. Line S. W., 1991, Laboratory Animal Science, 41, 365
  7. Mench J., 1994, Lab Animal, 23, 38
  8. Moynihan, M. (1976). The new world primates. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  9. Renner M. J., 1992, Primates, 33, 315, 10.1007/BF02381193 · DOI
  10. Renner, M. J. & Rosenzweig, M. R. (1987). Enriched and impoverished environments: Effects on brain and behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag. · DOI
  11. Rylands, A. B. (Ed.). (1993). Marmosets and tamarins: Systematics, behaviour, and ecology. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Rylands, A. B., Coimbra-Filho, A. F. & Mittermeier, R. A. (1993). Systematics, geographic distribution, and some notes on the conservation status of the Callitrichidae. In A. B. Rylands (Ed.), Marmosets and tamarins: Systematics, behaviour, and ecology (pp. 11-77). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  13. Shepherdson, D. J., Mellen, J. D. & Hutchins, M. (Eds.). (1998). Second nature: Environmental enrichment for captive animals. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
  14. Snowdon C. T., 1989, Zoo Biology Supplement, 1, 149, 10.1002/zoo.1430080515 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Renner, M. J., Feiner, A. J., Orr, M. G., & Delaney, B. A.
Venue
Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science
Published
2000-01
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
23-32
ISSN
  • 1088-8705
  • 1532-7604
Cited by
18
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review