The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Constructing Stable Preferences: A Look Into Dimensions of Experience and Their Impact on Preference Stability
Abstract
There are 2 polar schools of thought regarding the existence of preferences. The economics tradition is based on the assumption of existing preferences. The emerging constructive processing approach assumes preferences are constructed based on the task and context factors present during choice or preference elicitation. Most researchers believe in a middle ground in which consumers construct their preferences when they are new to a category and eventually develop more stable preferences with experience in a domain. This research was designed to bridge the gap between these 2 schools of thought by understanding the process by which preferences are learned and developed over time. Specifically, we investigated the impact of several dimensions of experience (effort, choice, and experience) on preference stability. Results revealed that the type of experience and its corresponding effort had a large impact on the process of preference development. Study 1 demonstrated that by exposing participants to the trade‐offs in their environment, their preferences developed and stabilized most rapidly. In addition, the act of making a choice (Study 2) and repeated choices (Study 3) both led to increased preference stability as indicated by measures of objective and subjective preference stability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173933 · Cited by 3,487
Cited by
Tried and tested: The impact of online hotel reviews on consumer consideration
Vermeulen, I. E., & Seegers, D. (2009) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2008.04.008 · Cited by 1,311
E-Commerce Product Recommendation Agents: Use, Characteristics, and Impact1
Xiao, B., & Benbasat, I. (2007) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148784 · Cited by 1,081
The Importance of Trust for Personalized Online Advertising
Bleier, A., & Eisenbeiss, M. (2015) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2015.04.001 · Cited by 529
Intelligent systems in tourism
Gretzel, U. (2011) · Annals of Tourism Research · doi:10.1016/j.annals.2011.04.014 · Cited by 468
Prior knowledge and complacency in new product learning
Wood, S. L., & Lynch, J. G. (2002) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/344425 · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoeffler, S., & Ariely, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 113-139
- ISSN
- 1057-7408 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7663
- OpenAlex
- W2093240945
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.