The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consumer Disclosure and Disclosure Avoidance: A Motivational Framework
Abstract
In this research, we investigate consumers’ motivations for disclosing personal information to relationship-seeking marketers. We explore the impact of consumers’ relationship perceptions, the nature of benefits offered by marketers in exchange for requested information, and the type of information requested on consumers’ disclosure willingness, focusing on consumers’ forecasts of 2 types of potential disclosure-related loss (i.e., loss of privacy and loss of face), which are shown to mediate this decision. The results of an experiment revealed that although participants with relatively deep relationship perceptions were more likely to reveal “privacy-related” personal information, they were more reluctant to reveal embarrassing information. The findings also suggest that although loyal customers found the exchange of privacy-related personal information for customized benefit offerings (relative to noncustomized offerings) attractive, the reverse was true for embarrassing information; these participants seemed to find the exchange of customized offerings for this latter type of information unattractive. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of the findings for consumer researchers and relationship-seeking marketing practitioners.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“InfCC related to prior personalized services or products (e.g., personalized recommendations) constitute a negative online experience, likely decreasing users' overall willingness to share information for personalization (Barnett White, 2004).”
From Transformative privacy calculus: Conceptualizing the personalization‐privacy paradox on social media (2024) · cites this paper as Barnett White, 2004
Citations
Cites
Intimate Exchanges: Using Computers to Elicit Self-Disclosure from Consumers
Moon, Y. (2000) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209566 · Cited by 842
Research works printed but not linked: 36
- Afifi W., 2000, Balancing the secrets of private disclosures: LEA's communications series, 165
- 10.1080/00224545.1988.9711690 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · DOI · Paper page
- Barrell J., 1976, Being honest with persons we like, Journal of Individual Psychology, 32, 185
- Bierhoff H.W., 1992, Life crises and experience of loss in adulthood, 411
- 10.1080/00224545.1982.9713443 · DOI
- Cozby P.C., 1973, Self‐disclosure: A literature review, Psychological Bulletin, 79, 73, 10.1037/h0033950 · DOI
- Culnan M. J. Milberg S. J. (1998).The second exchange: Managing customer information in marketing relationships.Retrieved August 8 2001 fromhttp://www.msb.georgetown.edu/faculty/pdf/jm97.pdf. · DOI
- Culnan M.J., 2000, Protecting privacy online: Is self‐regulation working?, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 19, 20, 10.1509/jppm.19.1.20.16944 · DOI
- 10.1086/323734 · DOI
- J.Deighton.The Future of interactive marketing.Harvard Business Review.1996;4–16(November‐December)
- Derlega V.J., 1993, Self‐disclosure
- Doney P., 1997, An examination of the nature of trust in buyer–seller relationship, Journal of Marketing, 6, 35
- 10.1037/h0031966 · DOI
- Duck S., 1988, Relating to others
- Edelmann R.J., 1994, The challenge of facework: Cross‐cultural and interpersonal issues: SUNY series in human communications processes, 231
- Emerson R.M., 1981, Social psychology: Sociological perspectives, 31
- Foa U.G., 1974, Societal structures of the mind
- 10.1086/209515 · DOI · Paper page
- Goffman E., 1959, The presentation of self in everyday life
- 10.1016/S1057-7408(08)80039-3 · DOI
- Hoffman D., 1997, A new marketing paradigm for electronic commerce, Information Society, 13, 43, 10.1080/019722497129278 · DOI
- Jourard S.M., 1971, Self‐disclosure: An experimental analysis of the transparent self
- 10.1037/0033-2909.120.3.450 · DOI
- 10.2307/351903 · DOI
- Metts S., 2000, Communication and personal relationships, 77
- Miller R., 1996, Embarrassment: poise and peril in everyday life
- 10.1509/jppm.19.1.1.16934 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6653(199924)13:1<5::AID-DIR2>3.0.CO;2-9 · DOI
- 10.2307/1252059 · DOI · Paper page
- Ogawa N., 1999, The concept of facework: Its functions in the Hawaii model of mediation, Mediation Quarterly, 17, 5, 10.1002/crq.3890170103 · DOI
- 10.1509/jppm.19.1.27.16941 · DOI · Paper page
- Roloff M.E., 1981, Interpersonal communication: The social exchange approach
- Rosenfeld L.B., 1979, Self‐disclosure avoidance: Why I am afraid to tell you who I am, Communications Monographs, 46, 62, 10.1080/03637757909375991 · DOI
- White T.B., 2000, Deciding to reveal: Consumer disclosure management in consumer/seller relationships, Dissertation Abstracts International, 61
- 10.1177/002216787301300309 · DOI
Cited by
The role of data privacy in marketing
Martin, K. D., & Murphy, P. E. (2017) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-016-0495-4 · Cited by 902
YOUN, S. (2009) · Journal of Consumer Affairs · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6606.2009.01146.x · Cited by 449
Strangers on a Plane: Context-Dependent Willingness to Divulge Sensitive Information
John, L. K., Acquisti, A., & Loewenstein, G. (2011) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/656423 · Cited by 414
Getting Too Personal: Reactance to Highly Personalized Email Solicitations
White, T. B., Zahay, D. L., Thorbjørnsen, H., & Shavitt, S. (2008) · Marketing Letters · doi:10.1007/s11002-007-9027-9 · Cited by 365
Self-citationThe Impact of Relative Standards on the Propensity to Disclose
Acquisti, A., John, L. K., & Loewenstein, G. (2012) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmr.09.0215 · Cited by 247
Metadata
- Authors
- Barnett White, T.
- Affiliations
- Department of Business Administration, University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 41-51
- ISSN
- 1057-7408 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7663
- OpenAlex
- W1969502195
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 12.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Consumer Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Journal of Consumer Psychology
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
- Keywords
- consumer disclosure, disclosure avoidance, personal data, relationship perceptions, privacy loss, loss of face, customer loyalty
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review