Cited by 42Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesPsychological Testing and AssessmentMental Health via Writing

Dichotomous Thinking as a Sign of Suicide Risk on the TAT

Litinsky, Ann M., Haslam, Nick·1998·Journal of Personality Assessment

Abstract

Previous research has supported theoretical claims that dichotomous thinking may be a risk factor for suicide. However, the concept of dichotomous thinking is vague, and thus far, no measures of it have been developed. This study developed a coding scheme useful on Thematic Aperception Test (TAT; Murray, 1943) protocols and applicable to other verbal productions to refine the concept of dichotomous thinking and to assess its utility as a predictor of suicidality. Suicidal patients had a significantly elevated rate of a narrowly defined type of dichotomous thinking involving diametric or polarized possibilities. However, suicidal and nonsuicidal patients did not differ on weaker forms of dichotomous thinking involving nonexclusive or nonbinary alternatives. Suicidal patients produced shorter TAT stories than nonsuicidal patients, supporting other findings in the literature that suicidal patients tend to be cognitively and affectively "shut down." Traditionally designated "suicide cards" also yielded shorter stories but did not elicit higher rates of dichotomous thinking.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15327752jpa7103_6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Litinsky, A. M., & Haslam, N.
Venue
Journal of Personality Assessment
Published
1998-12
Volume
71
Issue
3
Pages
368-378
ISSN
  • 0022-3891 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7752
OpenAlex
W2096604384
Cited by
42
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
Keywords
dichotomous thinking, suicide risk, Thematic Apperception Test, suicide risk prediction, story length, coding scheme
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Sex Factors, Suicide, Attempted, Thinking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review