CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 192Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychological Testing and AssessmentCounseling Practices and Supervision

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Interaction of Therapeutic Process and Alliance During Psychological Assessment

Ackerman, Steven J., Hilsenroth, Mark J., Baity, Matthew R., Blagys, Matthew D.·2000·Journal of Personality Assessment
DOI 10.1207/s15327752jpa7501_7
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Utilizing a collaborative therapeutic assessment (TA) model proposed by Finn and Tonsager (1997), we examined the interaction between therapeutic alliance and in-session process during the assessment phase of treatment. This study compares the utility of the TA model (n = 38) versus a traditional information gathering model (n = 90) of assessment. The results of this study indicate that the use of a TA model may decrease the number of patients who terminate treatment against medical advice. The Session Evaluation Questionnaire (Stiles & Snow, 1984), Combined Alliance Short Form (Hatcher & Barends, 1996), and Penn Helping Alliance Questionnaire-Revised (Barber & Crits-Christoph, 1996) can reliably measure the patient's experience of the assessment. The psychological assessment process may impact the patient's experience of assessment feedback and aid in the development of a therapeutic alliance. The therapeutic alliance developed during the assessment was found to be related to alliance early in psychotherapy. We discuss the theoretical, clinical, and research implications of these findings.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15327752jpa7501_7

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 57 references

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
  2. Fairbairn, W. R. (1952). Psychoanalytic studies of personality. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  3. 10.1037//1040-3590.4.3.278 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1037//1040-3590.9.4.374 · DOI
  5. Fowler C., 1995, Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 52, 31
  6. 10.1037//1040-3590.3.1.68 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Hartley, D. E. & Strupp, H. H. (1983). The therapeutic alliance: Its relationship to outcome in brief psychotherapy. In J. Masling (Ed.), Empirical studies of psychoanalytic theories (Vol. 1, pp. 1-37). Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
  8. 10.1037//0022-006X.56.6.885 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1037//0022-0167.42.3.338 · DOI
  10. Luborsky, L. & Crits-Christoph, P. (1997). Understanding transference: The core conflictual relational theme method (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  11. 10.1037//1040-3590.1.1.46 · DOI
  12. Murray, H. A. (1943). Manual for the Thematic Apperception Test. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  13. 10.1037//1040-3590.9.2.122 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Nunnally, J. & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  15. 10.1037//0022-006X.66.2.304 · DOI
  16. 10.1037//0022-0167.37.3.248 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–192 of 192

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Ackerman, S. J., Hilsenroth, M. J., Baity, M. R., & Blagys, M. D.
Affiliations
University of Arkansas at Fayetteville (US)
ORCID
Hilsenroth, Mark J.
Venue
Journal of Personality Assessment
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2000-08
Volume
75
Issue
1
Pages
82-109
ISSN
  • 0022-3891 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7752
DOI
10.1207/s15327752jpa7501_7
OpenAlex
W2065478162
Cited by
192
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
FWCI
4.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
Keywords
therapeutic relationship, psychological assessment, assessment feedback, psychotherapy
MeSH terms
Adult, Feedback, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Patient Compliance, Personality Disorders, Psychological Tests, Psychotherapy, Reproducibility of Results, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review