The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Students' Understanding of the Objectives and Procedures of Experimentation in the Science Classroom
Abstract
As part of a project to identify opportunities for reasoning that occur in good but typical science classrooms, this study focuses on how sixth graders reason about the goals and strategies of experimentation and laboratory activities in school. Collaborating with teachers, we explore whether reasoning can be deepened by developing instruction that capitalizes more effectively on the classroom opportunities that arise for fostering complex thinking and understanding. The design of the study includes (a) a baseline interview probing students' understanding of experimentation in the context of a standard, 40-min "hands-on" activity that is part of the standard sixth-grade curriculum; (b) a 3-week teaching study, in which five teachers, informed by the cognitive science research concerning the development of scientific reasoning, designed and taught a special experimentation unit in their classrooms; and (c) a series of follow-up interviews, in which students' understanding of experimentation was reexamined. The findings from the two learning contexts-one more supportive of student reasoning than the other-inform us about the kinds of reasoning that are developing in middle-school students and the forms of instruction best suited to exercising those developing skills.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vygotsky, L. S. (1964) · Bulletin of the Orton Society · doi:10.1007/bf02928399 · Cited by 20,704
Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x018001032 · Cited by 13,645
Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing
Klayman, J., & Ha, Y.-W. (1987) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.94.2.211 · Cited by 2,094
Kuhn, D. (1991) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511571350 · Cited by 2,094
Interest and effort in education.
Dewey, J. (1913) · Houghton Mifflin eBooks · doi:10.1037/14633-000 · Cited by 1,411
Classroom lessons: integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-2863 · Cited by 1,175
Guided Discovery in a Community of Learners
Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1994) · Classroom Lessons · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1861.003.0016 · Cited by 1,152
Dual space search during scientific reasoning
Klahr, D., & Dunbar, K. (1988) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1201_1 · Cited by 1,058
Scientific Discovery: Computational Explorations of the Creative Processes
Pat Langley, B., Simon, H. A., Bradshaw, G. L., & Żytkow, J. M. (1987) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 802
Children and adults as intuitive scientists.
Kuhn, D. (1989) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.96.4.674 · Cited by 774
Cited by
The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes
Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2014.965823 · Cited by 2,911
Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains
De Jong, T., & Van Joolingen, W. R. (1998) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543068002179 · Cited by 1,593
Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks
Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.10001 · Cited by 1,302
Supporting and Promoting Argumentation Discourse in Science Education
Duschl, R. A., & Osborne, J. (2002) · Studies in Science Education · doi:10.1080/03057260208560187 · Cited by 1,161
Self-citationEngle, R. A., & Conant, F. R. (2002) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci2004_1 · Cited by 1,161
Metadata
- Authors
- Schauble, L., Glaser, R., Duschl, R. A., Schulze, S., & John, J.
- Venue
- Journal of the Learning Sciences
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1995-04
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 131-166
- ISSN
- 1050-8406 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7809
- OpenAlex
- W2041894816
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 49.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Students' Understanding of the Objectives and Procedures of Experimentation in the Science Classroom. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s15327809jls0402_1
- The paper
- Schauble, L., Glaser, R., Duschl, R. A., Schulze, S., & John, J. (1995). Students' Understanding of the Objectives and Procedures of Experimentation in the Science Classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0402_1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.