Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 213

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Beyond the Centralized Mindset

Resnick, Mitchel·1996·Journal of the Learning Sciences

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a growing fascination with decentralized systems and self-organizing phenomena. Increasingly, people are choosing decentralized models for the organizations and technologies that they construct in the world and for the theories that they construct about the world. However, even as decentralized ideas spread through the culture, there is a deep-seated resistance to such ideas. In trying to understand patterns in the world, people often assume centralized control where none exists (e.g., assuming that a "leader bird" guides the rest of the flock). To probe how people think about decentralized systems and to help them develop new ways of thinking about such systems, I developed a programmable modeling environment called StarLogo with which people can easily create and experiment with decentralized systems. StarLogo allows users to control the actions and interactions of thousands of artificial creatures on the computer screen. I describe three StarLogo projects created by high-school students. Based on my observations of these and other students, I analyze the nature of the centralized mindset, and I discuss how people, through engagement with new types of computational tools and activities, can begin to move beyond the centralized mindset. In recent years, there has been a growing fascination with decentralized systems and self-organizing phenomena. Increasingly, people are choosing decentralized models for the organizations and technologies that they construct in the world and for the theories that they construct about the world. However, even as decentralized ideas spread through the culture, there is a deep-seated resistance to such ideas. In trying to understand patterns in the world, people often assume centralized control where none exists (e.g., assuming that a "leader bird" guides the rest of the flock). To probe how people think about decentralized systems and to help them develop new ways of thinking about such systems, I...

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15327809jls0501_1

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 213

Metadata

Authors
Resnick, M.
Venue
Journal of the Learning Sciences
Published
1996-01
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
1-22
ISSN
  • 1050-8406 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7809
OpenAlex
W2046330957
Cited by
213
References
0
FWCI
42.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Beyond the Centralized Mindset. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s15327809jls0501_1
The paper
Resnick, M. (1996). Beyond the Centralized Mindset. Journal of the Learning Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0501_1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.