The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Beyond the Centralized Mindset
Abstract
In recent years, there has been a growing fascination with decentralized systems and self-organizing phenomena. Increasingly, people are choosing decentralized models for the organizations and technologies that they construct in the world and for the theories that they construct about the world. However, even as decentralized ideas spread through the culture, there is a deep-seated resistance to such ideas. In trying to understand patterns in the world, people often assume centralized control where none exists (e.g., assuming that a "leader bird" guides the rest of the flock). To probe how people think about decentralized systems and to help them develop new ways of thinking about such systems, I developed a programmable modeling environment called StarLogo with which people can easily create and experiment with decentralized systems. StarLogo allows users to control the actions and interactions of thousands of artificial creatures on the computer screen. I describe three StarLogo projects created by high-school students. Based on my observations of these and other students, I analyze the nature of the centralized mindset, and I discuss how people, through engagement with new types of computational tools and activities, can begin to move beyond the centralized mindset. In recent years, there has been a growing fascination with decentralized systems and self-organizing phenomena. Increasingly, people are choosing decentralized models for the organizations and technologies that they construct in the world and for the theories that they construct about the world. However, even as decentralized ideas spread through the culture, there is a deep-seated resistance to such ideas. In trying to understand patterns in the world, people often assume centralized control where none exists (e.g., assuming that a "leader bird" guides the rest of the flock). To probe how people think about decentralized systems and to help them develop new ways of thinking about such systems, I...
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Commonsense Conceptions of Emergent Processes: Why Some Misconceptions Are Robust
Chi, M. T. H. (2005) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1402_1 · Cited by 894
Engineering in K–12 Education: Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects
(2010) · INSIGHT · doi:10.1002/inst.20101338 · Cited by 816
Jacobson, M. J., & Wilensky, U. (2006) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1501_4 · Cited by 679
Technology and mathematics education
Konold, C., & Lehrer, R. (2015) · Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education · doi:10.4324/9780203930236.ch4 · Cited by 448
Keynote paper: Unlocking the learning value of wireless mobile devices
Roschelle, J. (2003) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1046/j.0266-4909.2003.00028.x · Cited by 425
Metadata
- Authors
- Resnick, M.
- Venue
- Journal of the Learning Sciences
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1996-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-22
- ISSN
- 1050-8406 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7809
- OpenAlex
- W2046330957
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 42.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Beyond the Centralized Mindset. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s15327809jls0501_1
- The paper
- Resnick, M. (1996). Beyond the Centralized Mindset. Journal of the Learning Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0501_1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.