The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Mathematical Modeling of Structural Engineers
Open accessAbstract
Math-education reformers encourage the incorporation of mathematical modeling activities into K-12 curricula. Many of the purported educational benefits derive from the authenticity of the activities-how well they reflect the everyday and occupational mathematical practices of adults. But a paucity in the literature of observational descriptions of adult modeling behavior has made it difficult to judge the authenticity of classroom activities and their potential to prepare students for out-of-school problem solving. The ethnographic study reported here investigated the everyday problem-solving activity of structural engineers in practice. Modeling was found to be central to and ubiquitous in the engineers' work, giving rise to some of their greatest intellectual challenges. These engineers use, adapt, and create models of various representation forms and degrees of abstraction. Two major challenges of modeling emerged: understanding inaccessible phenomena and keeping track of models. These challenges, and the nature of engineering models themselves, are not well reflected in the modeling tasks typically prescribed for the K-12 classroom, which will likely limit their educational benefits.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life
Lave, J. (1988) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609268 · Cited by 5,148
Disciplined Perception: Learning to See in Technoscience
Stevens, R., & Hall, R. (1998) · Talking Mathematics in School · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511571251.007 · Cited by 248
Cited by
Engineering in K–12 Education: Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects
(2010) · INSIGHT · doi:10.1002/inst.20101338 · Cited by 816
Metadata
- Authors
- Gainsburg, J.
- Venue
- Mathematical Thinking and Learning
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-36
- ISSN
- 1098-6065 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7833
- OpenAlex
- W2016922693
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Mathematical Modeling of Structural Engineers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s15327833mtl0801_2
- The paper
- Gainsburg, J. (2006). The Mathematical Modeling of Structural Engineers. Mathematical Thinking and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0801_2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.