The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intersubjectivity Without Agreement
Abstract
In this paper, there is an attempt to construct the notion of intersubjectivity as a process of a coordination of participants' contributions in joint activity. This notion incorporates the dynamics of both agreement and disagreement. I argue that a traditional definition of intersubjectivity as a state of overlap of individual understandings overemphasizes agreement and de-emphasizes disagreement among the participants in joint activity. It disregards disagreement at two levels: 1) by focusing only on integrative, consensus seeking, activities, in which disagreement among participants of joint activity often is viewed as only the initial point of the joint activity that has to be resolved by the final agreement (macro-level), and by considering disagreements as only nuisances or obstacles while focusing on integrative activities (micro-level). To illustrate how disagreement can constitute intersubjectivity at macro- and micro-levels, examples of children ' s development of a classroom play are examined. Diversity and fluidity of intersubjectivity will be discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1997) · Reis · doi:10.2307/40183951 · Cited by 11,113
Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life
Lave, J. (1988) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609268 · Cited by 5,148
Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context
Rogoff, B. (1990) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195059731.001.0001 · Cited by 4,709
CULTURAL THOUGHT PATTERNS IN INTER‐CULTURAL EDUCATION
Kaplan, R. B. (1966) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1966.tb00804.x · Cited by 2,069
Tomasello, M., Kruger, A. C., & Ratner, H. H. (1993) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x0003123x · Cited by 1,891
Cited by
Wells, G., & Arauz, R. M. (2006) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1503_3 · Cited by 515
Fusaroli (2012) · doi:10.1177/0956797612436816 · Cited by 379
Emotions in SLA: New Insights From Collaborative Learning for an EFL Classroom
IMAI, Y. (2010) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01021.x · Cited by 216
Online Learning in Sociocultural Context
Warschauer, M. (1998) · Anthropology & Education Quarterly · doi:10.1525/aeq.1998.29.1.68 · Cited by 133
Dynamic Development of Thinking, Feeling, and Acting
Mascolo, M. F., & Fischer, K. W. (2015) · Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science · doi:10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy104 · Cited by 115
Metadata
- Authors
- Matusov, E.
- Venue
- Mind, Culture, and Activity
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1996-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-45
- ISSN
- 1074-9039 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7884
- OpenAlex
- W2135079875
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 13.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intersubjectivity Without Agreement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s15327884mca0301_4
- The paper
- Matusov, E. (1996). Intersubjectivity Without Agreement. Mind, Culture, and Activity. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327884mca0301_4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
