The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors
Abstract
(1966). The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research: Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 245-276.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“we observed the scree in the scree plot at three factors; thus corresponding to our hypothesized three-factor model of CBE.”
From Consumer Brand Engagement in Social Media: Conceptualization, Scale Development and Validation (2014) · cites this paper as Cattell 1966
Citations
Cites
Some necessary conditions for common-factor analysis
Guttman, L. (1954) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02289162 · Cited by 1,689
Research works printed but not linked: 29
- Burt C. L, 1950, Statist. Sect., 3, 77
- Cattell R. B, 1958, Measmt, 18, 791
- Cattell R. B, 1963, Psychol., 54, 1
- Cattell, R. B. The data box: its ordering of total resources in terms of possible relational systems. Chap. 3 in R. B. Cattell (Ed.) Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1966 (a).
- Cattell, R. B. The strategic use and meaning of factor analysis. Chap. 6 in R. B. Cattell (Ed.), Handbook of multivariate ezperimcnztal psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1966 (b).
- Cattell, R. B. The scientific model rationale for deciding the number and nature of factors in factor analytic experiments. In press, 1967.
- Cattell R. B., 1962, Psychol. Bull., 59, 389, 10.1037/h0048441 · DOI
- Cattell, R. B., and Digman, J. M. A theory of the structure of perturbations in observer ratings and questionnaire data in personality research. Behav. S C ~ . 1964, 4, 341-358.
- 10.1007/BF02289548 · DOI
- Cattell R. B., 1966, Psychol. Beitruge, 8, 502
- Cattell R. B., 1962, Behav. Sei., 7, 184, 10.1002/bs.3830070204 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02288058 · DOI
- Dickman, K. W. Factorial validity of a rating instrument. Ph.D. thesis, Univer. of Illinois, Urbana, Ill., 1960.
- Fruchter, B. Manipulative and hypothesis-testing factor analytic experimental designs. Chap. 10 in R. B. Cattell (Ed.), Handbook of multivariate experimental pgchology. Chicago : Rand McNally, 1966.
- Gorsuch, R. L., and Cattell, R. B. Second strata personality factors defined in the questionnaire medium by the 16 P.F. In press J . SOC. Psychol., 1966. · DOI
- Harman, H. H. Modern f a c t o r analysis. Chicago: Univer. of Chicago Press, 1960.
- Horn, J. L. A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis Psyohmetrika, 1966, 30, 179-185. · DOI
- Humphreys L. G, 1964, Memmt, 24, 457
- Kaiser H. T, 1960, Measmt, 20, 141
- Lawley D. N, 1956, Biometrika, 43, 128, 10.1093/biomet/43.1-2.128 · DOI
- Linn, R. L. Use of random normal deviates to determine the number of factors to extract in factor analysis. Unpublished M.A. thesis, Univer. of Illinois, 1964. · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02289269 · DOI
- Nesselroade, J. R. An empirical examination of factor invariance with different rotational methods and indicm of matching. Unpublished M.A. thesis, Univer. of Illinois, 1966.
- 10.1007/BF02288983 · DOI
- Sokal R. R, 1959, Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci., 62, 141, 10.2307/3626519 · DOI
- Thurstone, L. L. Primary mental abilities. Chicago: Univer. of Chicago Press, 1938.
- Thurstone, L. L. Multiple factor analysis. Chicago: Univer. of Chicago Press, 1947.
- Tsujioka B., 1966, Psychol., 65, 206
- Tucker, L. R. In L. L. Thurstone, Primary mental abilities. Psychometr. Monogr., 1938, No. 1. Chicago: Univer. of Chicago Press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Abdi, H., & Williams, L. J. (2010) · WIREs Computational Statistics · doi:10.1002/wics.101 · Cited by 11,104
Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research.
Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.4.3.272 · Cited by 9,587
Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149 · Cited by 5,925
Scale Development Research: A Content Analysis and Recommendations for Best Practices
Worthington, R. L., & Whittaker, T. A. (2006) · The Counseling Psychologist · doi:10.1177/0011000006288127 · Cited by 4,087
The Self-Efficacy Scale: Construction and Validation
Sherer, M., Maddux, J. E., Mercandante, B., Prentice-Dunn, S., Jacobs, B., & Rogers, R. W. (1982) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1982.51.2.663 · Cited by 4,028
Metadata
- Authors
- Cattell, R. B.
- Corresponding author
- Cattell, Raymond B.
- Venue
- Multivariate Behavioral Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1966-04
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 245-276
- ISSN
- 0027-3171 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7906
- OpenAlex
- W2133097426
- Cited by
- 13,554
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 443 · 2025: 554 · 2024: 528 · 2023: 572 · 2022: 625 · 2021: 761 · 2020: 665 · 2019: 629 · 2018: 554 · 2017: 590 · 2016: 571 · 2015: 582 · 2014: 587 · 2013: 572 · 2012: 538
- FWCI
- 12.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Multivariate Behavioral Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
- Keywords
- scree test, number of factors, factor analysis, factor retention, eigenvalues
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review