The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of Oral Eicosapentaenoic Acid on Weight Loss in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer
Abstract
Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) has been shown to modulate aspects of the inflammatory response that may contribute to weight loss in cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the acceptability and effects of oral supplementation with high-purity EPA in weight-losing patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Twenty-six patients were entered into the study. EPA (95% pure) was administered as free acid starting at 1 g/day; the dose was increased to 6 g/day over four weeks, and then a maintenance dose of 6 g/day was administered. Patients were assessed before EPA and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks while receiving EPA, for weight, body composition, hematologic and clinical chemistry variables, acute-phase protein response, and performance status. Overall survival was noted. Supplementation was well tolerated, with only five patients experiencing side effects possibly attributable to the EPA. Before starting EPA, all patients had been losing weight at a median rate of 2 kg/mo. In general, after EPA supplementation, weight was stable. After four weeks of EPA supplementation, patients had a median weight gain of 0.5 kg (p = 0.0009 vs. rate of weight loss at baseline), and this stabilization of weight persisted over the 12-week study period. Total body water as a percentage of body weight remained stable, as did the proportion of patients with an acute-phase protein response, patients' nutritional intake, and performance status. Overall median survival from diagnosis in this study was 203 days. This study suggests that EPA is well tolerated, may stabilize weight in cachectic pancreatic cancer patients, and should be tested as an anticachectic agent in controlled trials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adverse metabolic effect of omega-3 fatty acids in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus
GLAUBER, H., WALLACE, P., GRIVER, K., & BRECHTEL, G. (1988) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-108-5-663 · Cited by 285
Cited by
Omega-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids: Benefits and Endpoints in Sport
Gammone, M. A., Riccioni, G., Parrinello, G., & D’Orazio, N. (2018) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu11010046 · Cited by 326
Insulin-sensitizing effects of omega-3 fatty acids: lost in translation?
Lalia, A., & Lanza, I. (2016) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu8060329 · Cited by 141
Zwart, S. R., Pierson, D., Mehta, S., Gonda, S., & Smith, S. M. (2010) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1359/jbmr.091041 · Cited by 122
Nutritional interventions for cancer-induced cachexia
Gullett, N. P., Mazurak, V. C., Hebbar, G., & Ziegler, T. R. (2011) · Current Problems in Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2011.01.001 · Cited by 114
Lalia, A. Z., Johnson, M. L., Jensen, M. D., Hames, K. C., Port, J. D., & Lanza, I. R. (2015) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc14-3101 · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Wigmore, S. J., Barber, M. D., Ross, J. A., Tisdale, M. J., & Fearon, K. C. H.
- Venue
- Nutrition and Cancer
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-03-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 177-184
- ISSN
- 0163-5581 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7914
- OpenAlex
- W2073560422
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Oral Eicosapentaenoic Acid on Weight Loss in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s15327914nc3602_6
- The paper
- Wigmore, S. J., Barber, M. D., Ross, J. A., Tisdale, M. J., & Fearon, K. C. H. (2000). Effect of Oral Eicosapentaenoic Acid on Weight Loss in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer. Nutrition and Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327914nc3602_6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.