The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mechanisms Linking Diet and Colorectal Cancer: The Possible Role of Insulin Resistance
Abstract
Diet is clearly implicated in the origin of colorectal cancer, with risk factors for the disease including reduced consumption of vegetables, fiber, and starch and increased consumption of red meat and animal fat. Several hypotheses have been developed to explain these associations. Most recently, McKeown-Eyssen and Giovannucci noted the similarity of the risk factors for colorectal cancer and those for insulin resistance and suggested that insulin resistance leads to colorectal cancer through the growth-promoting effect of elevated levels of insulin, glucose, or triglycerides. We briefly review the evidence from observational, epidemiological, and experimental animal studies linking diet with insulin resistance and colorectal cancer. The evidence suggests that diets high in energy and saturated fat and with high glycemic index carbohydrate and low levels of fiber and n-3 fatty acids lead to insulin resistance with hyperinsulinemia, hyperglycemia, and hypertriglyceridemia. We then consider how insulin, the related insulin-like growth factors, triglycerides, and nonesterified fatty acids could lead to increased growth of colon cancer precursor lesions and the development of colorectal cancer. Finally, we consider the implications of this scheme on possible future research directions, including studies of satiety and clinical tests of the importance of insulin resistance in the colon carcinogenesis process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Randle, P. J., Garland, P. B., Hales, C. N., & Newsholme, E. A. (1963) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(63)91500-9 · Cited by 5,093
Storlien, L. H., Jenkins, A. B., Chisholm, D. J., Pascoe, W. S., Khouri, S., & Kraegen, E. W. (1991) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/diab.40.2.280 · Cited by 967
Schmitz-Peiffer, C., Browne, C. L., Oakes, N. D., Watkinson, A., Chisholm, D. J., Kraegen, E. W., & Biden, T. J. (1997) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/diab.46.2.169 · Cited by 314
Cited by
Fruit, Vegetables, Dietary Fiber, and Risk of Colorectal Cancer
Terry, P., Giovannucci, E., Michels, K. B., Bergkvist, L., Hansen, H., Holmberg, L., & Wolk, A. (2001) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/93.7.525 · Cited by 579
Obesity and cancer risk: the role of the insulin-IGF axis
Renehan, A. G., Frystyk, J., & Flyvbjerg, A. (2006) · Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.tem.2006.08.006 · Cited by 480
Chemistry, Pharmacology and Health Benefits of Anthocyanins
Smeriglio, A., Barreca, D., Bellocco, E., & Trombetta, D. (2016) · Phytotherapy Research · doi:10.1002/ptr.5642 · Cited by 447
Meyerhardt, J. A., Catalano, P. J., Haller, D. G., Mayer, R. J., Benson, A. B., Macdonald, J. S., & Fuchs, C. S. (2003) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.11544 · Cited by 306
Tabung, F. K., Steck, S. E., Ma, Y., Liese, A. D., Zhang, J., Caan, B., Hou, L., Johnson, K. C., Mossavar-Rahmani, Y., Shivappa, N., et al. (2015) · Cancer Causes & Control · doi:10.1007/s10552-014-0515-y · Cited by 193
Metadata
- Authors
- Bruce, W. R., Wolever, T. M. S., & Giacca, A.
- Venue
- Nutrition and Cancer
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-05
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 19-26
- ISSN
- 0163-5581 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7914
- OpenAlex
- W2081474553
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 2.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanisms Linking Diet and Colorectal Cancer: The Possible Role of Insulin Resistance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s15327914nc3701_2
- The paper
- Bruce, W. R., Wolever, T. M. S., & Giacca, A. (2000). Mechanisms Linking Diet and Colorectal Cancer: The Possible Role of Insulin Resistance. Nutrition and Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327914nc3701_2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.