A Newer Look: Motivated Social Cognition and the Schematic Representation of Social Concepts
Abstract
In this article, I argue that the basic building blocks of social cognition, the schemata people possess of social traits and concepts, are shaped by motivations to retain flattering images of the self. As such, motivational influences on social cognition are more subtle and pervasive than usually acknowledged in the social cognitive literature. 1 review research showing that people possess serf-Pattering schemata of social concepts. I describe experimental work demonstrating that it is, indeed, the motivation to maintain self-worth prompting the self-serving nature of these schemata, detailing how these studies withstand the usual cognitive reinterpretations offered for motivational findings. Finally, I suggest that the field of social cognition reconsider the issues and insights of the New Look tradition, which concerned itself first and foremost with how people reconciled incoming social information with the perceiver's goals, wishes, fears, and desires.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Ego-justifying mechanisms involve the self-serving tendency to advance and maintain one's own pre-existing beliefs, opinions and values and to defend against information that might contradict any of those.
“Ego-justifying mechanisms involve the self-serving tendency to advance and maintain one’s own pre-existing beliefs, opinions and values and to defend against information that might contradict any of those98,99.”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [98]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 54 · Cited by 264
- Authors
- Dunning, D.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dunning, David
- ORCID
- Dunning, David
- Venue
- Psychological Inquiry
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1999-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-11
- ISSN
- 1047-840X (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7965
- OpenAlex
- W2093996137
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 27.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Inquiry (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- social cognition, self-serving bias, self-worth, self-image, social concepts, schemas, motivational factors, self-presentation, social characteristics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review