Challenges and opportunities for patients with HIV who educate health professionals
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patient perspectives are valuable for clinical care and teaching. PURPOSE: To understand personal and programmatic effects of using HIV-infected persons as teachers in courses about care of HIV-infected people. METHODS: Semistructured interviews with HIV-infected faculty for New England AIDS Education and Training Center (NEAETC), addressing teaching decision and its personal, medical, and psychological consequences. Interview transcripts were analyzed via iterative, consensus building. RESULTS: Participants reported consequences of teaching that benefited them as patients (finding health care providers, increasing their knowledge base, and receiving tangible rewards such as gifts). A deeper level of benefit was realized personally, increasing control over their life and disease. Relationships, personal and professional, changed, from unilateral to mutual, heightening a sense of their own empowerment. Teaching built support networks and aided in coping with difficult issues raised (negative emotions, informing significant others about their infection, death and dying). Program support was essential for participation, allowing numerous teachers to transform teaching from individual messages to universal lessons. CONCLUSIONS: The program was well received and well regarded by participating teachers. Convenience sampling does not account for nonparticipating faculty viewpoints or those who left the program, but concrete benefits can be expected if support and investment by the program is in place. Learning by these HIV-infected teachers fits the characteristics of transformational learning.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Patient teachers stated that programme support was essential for participation, allowing them to transform from teaching individual messages to teaching universal lessons.
“Patient teachers stated that programme support was essential for participation, allowing them to transform from teaching individual messages to teaching universal lessons.43”
From Role of active patient involvement in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as [43]
Patients described receiving tangible rewards such as gifts as a material benefit.
“Material benefits included receiving tangible rewards such as gifts43”
From Role of active patient involvement in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as [43]
Hatem et al reported that patients got better at finding healthcare providers as a practical benefit.
“Hatem et al reported practical benefits for patients including getting better at finding healthcare providers and increased knowledge of their medical condition.43”
From Role of active patient involvement in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as [43]
Hatem et al reported that patients had increased knowledge of their medical condition as a practical benefit.
“and increased knowledge of their medical condition.43”
From Role of active patient involvement in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as [43]
In some cases, unanticipated disease progression resulted in patients pulling out of their commitment as teachers, an inevitable loss among patient educators.
“In some cases, this resulted in them pulling out of their commitment as teachers, an inevitable loss among patient educators.43”
From Role of active patient involvement in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as [43]
Ten studies offered participating patients remuneration through honoraria between €8 per hour and £350 per day or an unspecified amount.
“Ten studies offered participating patients remuneration through honoraria between €8 per hour and £350 per day43 53 54 or an unspecified amount.28 35 39 48 50 57”
From Role of active patient involvement in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as [43]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 14 · Cited by 15
- Authors
- Hatem, D. S., Gallagher, D., & Frankel, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
- Highland Hospital (US)
- Venue
- Teaching and Learning in Medicine
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2003-04
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 98-105
- ISSN
- 1040-1334 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-8015
- OpenAlex
- W2012617618
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Teaching and Learning in Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
- Keywords
- patient educators, HIV education, transformative learning, patient empowerment, health professions education, program support, HIV status disclosure, coping with illness
- MeSH terms
- Education, Medical, HIV Seropositivity, Humans, Physician-Patient Relations, Teaching
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review