Cited by 15Innovations in Medical EducationEmpathy and Medical EducationHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions

Challenges and opportunities for patients with HIV who educate health professionals

Hatem, David S., Gallagher, Donna, Frankel, Richard·2003·Teaching and Learning in Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patient perspectives are valuable for clinical care and teaching. PURPOSE: To understand personal and programmatic effects of using HIV-infected persons as teachers in courses about care of HIV-infected people. METHODS: Semistructured interviews with HIV-infected faculty for New England AIDS Education and Training Center (NEAETC), addressing teaching decision and its personal, medical, and psychological consequences. Interview transcripts were analyzed via iterative, consensus building. RESULTS: Participants reported consequences of teaching that benefited them as patients (finding health care providers, increasing their knowledge base, and receiving tangible rewards such as gifts). A deeper level of benefit was realized personally, increasing control over their life and disease. Relationships, personal and professional, changed, from unilateral to mutual, heightening a sense of their own empowerment. Teaching built support networks and aided in coping with difficult issues raised (negative emotions, informing significant others about their infection, death and dying). Program support was essential for participation, allowing numerous teachers to transform teaching from individual messages to universal lessons. CONCLUSIONS: The program was well received and well regarded by participating teachers. Convenience sampling does not account for nonparticipating faculty viewpoints or those who left the program, but concrete benefits can be expected if support and investment by the program is in place. Learning by these HIV-infected teachers fits the characteristics of transformational learning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15328015tlm1502_05

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 14 · Cited by 15

Authors
Hatem, D. S., Gallagher, D., & Frankel, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
  • Highland Hospital (US)
Venue
Teaching and Learning in Medicine
Published
2003-04
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
98-105
ISSN
  • 1040-1334 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-8015
OpenAlex
W2012617618
Cited by
15
References
14
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Teaching and Learning in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Keywords
patient educators, HIV education, transformative learning, patient empowerment, health professions education, program support, HIV status disclosure, coping with illness
MeSH terms
Education, Medical, HIV Seropositivity, Humans, Physician-Patient Relations, Teaching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review