The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Overview
Open accessAbstract
(2002). A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Overview. Theory Into Practice: Vol. 41, Revising Bloom's Taxonomy, pp. 212-218.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
Citations
Cites
(2001) · Cited by 13,930
Self-citationBloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956) · Cited by 9,342
Self-citation(1956) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,596
Self-citationAnderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001) · Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government) · Cited by 1,194
Self-citationTHE CLASSIFICATION OF EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES, PSYCHOMOTOR DOMAIN.
Simpson, E. J. (1966) · Cited by 640
A Taxonomy of the Psychomotor Domain: A Guide for Developing Behavioral Objectives
Cooper, W. F., & Harrow, A. J. (1973) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.2307/1161665 · Cited by 345
Airasian, P. W. (2000) · Cited by 63
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Dave, R.H. (1970). Psychomotor levels. In R.J. Armstrong (Ed.), Developing and writing educational objectives (pp. 33-34). Tucson AZ: Educational Innovators Press.
- Simpson B.J., 1966, Illinois Journal of Home Economics, 10, 110
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Social robots for education: a review.
Belpaeme, T., Kennedy, J., Ramachandran, A., Scassellati, B., & Tanaka, F. (2018) · Science Robotics · doi:10.1126/scirobotics.aat5954 · Cited by 1,558
Enhancing Student Engagement Using the Flipped Classroom
Gilboy, M. B., Heinerichs, S., & Pazzaglia, G. (2014) · Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2014.08.008 · Cited by 1,120
Increased Structure and Active Learning Reduce the Achievement Gap in Introductory Biology
Haak, D. C., HilleRisLambers, J., Pitre, E., & Freeman, S. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1204820 · Cited by 959
Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction
Mayer, R. E., & Alexander, P. A. (2011) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203839089 · Cited by 969
An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century
Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M., & Stewart, I. (2014) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2013.12.004 · Cited by 960
Metadata
- Authors
- Krathwohl, D. R.
- Corresponding author
- Krathwohl, David R.
- Venue
- Theory Into Practice
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2002-11-01
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 212-218
- ISSN
- 0040-5841 (ISSN-L)
- 1543-0421
- OpenAlex
- W2162821268
- Semantic Scholar
- 93c7232b15a84f2d37a5184a65d13a22fc15df31
- Cited by
- 8,132
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 717 · 2025: 694 · 2024: 657 · 2023: 678 · 2022: 631 · 2021: 660 · 2020: 636 · 2019: 541 · 2018: 405 · 2017: 478 · 2016: 393 · 2015: 396 · 2014: 353 · 2013: 280 · 2012: 197
- FWCI
- 50.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- dergipark.org.tr
- Locations
- Theory Into Practice (publishedVersion)
- DergiPark (Istanbul University) (submittedVersion)
- İlköğretim Online (elektronik)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Education › Education and Critical Thinking Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Keywords
- Bloom's taxonomy, Bloom's revised taxonomy, educational objectives, learning outcomes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
