Metacognition: A Bridge Between Cognitive Psychology and Educational Practice
Abstract
Although they have their differences, educational practitioners and academic researchers largely agree on a broad goal: to develop in students the kinds of thinking skills that will prepare them to contribute to a democratic society. But the two groups largely speak different languages. While educators frequently talk about critical thinking as an objective, researchers have largely avoided the term, preferring constructs that can be more precisely defined and measured. How do we connect critical thinking to modern research on cognition and learning? The authors propose the construct of metacognition as having the potential to bridge the concerns of educators and researchers whose work is addressed to the development of skilled thinking. Given its growing importance in studies of cognition and learning, teachers would benefit from an understanding of the mechanisms involved in metacognition and how best to foster it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Critical thinking entails awareness of one's own thinking and reflection on the thinking of self and others as an object of cognition, in other words metacognition.
“Kuhn and Dean (2004) argue that 'critical thinking . . . entails awareness of one's own thinking and reflection on the thinking of self and others as an object of cognition' (p. 270), in other words, metacognition.”
From ‘Why is this hard, to have critical thinking?’ Exploring the factors affecting critical thinking with international higher education students (2024) · cites this paper as Kuhn and Dean, 2004
This journey is one that all critical thinkers must make, regardless of culture or educational background.
“So this journey is one that all critical thinkers must make, regardless of culture or educational background”
From ‘Why is this hard, to have critical thinking?’ Exploring the factors affecting critical thinking with international higher education students (2024) · cites this paper as Kuhn and Dean, 2004
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Metacognitive Judgments and Control of Study
Metcalfe, J. (2009) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01628.x · Cited by 374 · see citing works
Student thought and classroom language: examining the mechanisms of change in dialogic teaching
Reznitskaya, A., & Gregory, M. (2013) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2013.775898 · Cited by 289 · see citing works
Evaluating the metacognitive awareness inventory using empirical factor-structure evidence
Harrison, G. M., & Vallin, L. M. (2018) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-017-9176-z · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Critical thinking for 21st-century education: A cyber-tooth curriculum?
Higgins, S. (2014) · PROSPECTS · doi:10.1007/s11125-014-9323-0 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Aston, K. J. (2024) · Active Learning in Higher Education · doi:10.1177/14697874231168341 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
The Effect of Prequestions on Learning: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis
King-Shepard, Q. W., Walker, J., Nokes-Malach, T. J., Carpenter, S. K., & Fraundorf, S. H. (2025) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-025-10075-7 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kuhn, D., & Dean, Jr.
- ORCID
- Kuhn, Deanna
- Venue
- Theory Into Practice
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-11
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 268-273
- ISSN
- 0040-5841 (ISSN-L)
- 1543-0421
- OpenAlex
- W2162462650
- Cited by
- 481
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 7.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Theory Into Practice (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Education and Critical Thinking Development
- Keywords
- metacognition, critical thinking, thinking skills, cognitive psychology, teaching practice, research-practice gap, metacognition instruction, democratic education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review