Cited by 481Educational Strategies and EpistemologiesInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsEducation and Critical Thinking Development

Metacognition: A Bridge Between Cognitive Psychology and Educational Practice

Kuhn, Deanna, Dean, Jr., David·2004·Theory Into Practice

Abstract

Although they have their differences, educational practitioners and academic researchers largely agree on a broad goal: to develop in students the kinds of thinking skills that will prepare them to contribute to a democratic society. But the two groups largely speak different languages. While educators frequently talk about critical thinking as an objective, researchers have largely avoided the term, preferring constructs that can be more precisely defined and measured. How do we connect critical thinking to modern research on cognition and learning? The authors propose the construct of metacognition as having the potential to bridge the concerns of educators and researchers whose work is addressed to the development of skilled thinking. Given its growing importance in studies of cognition and learning, teachers would benefit from an understanding of the mechanisms involved in metacognition and how best to foster it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15430421tip4304_4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kuhn, D., & Dean, Jr.
Venue
Theory Into Practice
Published
2004-11
Volume
43
Issue
4
Pages
268-273
ISSN
  • 0040-5841 (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-0421
OpenAlex
W2162462650
Cited by
481
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 18
FWCI
7.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Theory Into Practice (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Critical Thinking Development
Keywords
metacognition, critical thinking, thinking skills, cognitive psychology, teaching practice, research-practice gap, metacognition instruction, democratic education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review