Cited by 182Psychometric Methodologies and TestingInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsEducational Strategies and Epistemologies

Evaluating the metacognitive awareness inventory using empirical factor-structure evidence

Harrison, George M., Vallin, Lisa M.·2018·Metacognition and Learning

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11409-017-9176-z

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 93 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harrison, G. M., & Vallin, L. M.
Affiliations
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
Corresponding author
Harrison, George M.
Venue
Metacognition and Learning
Published
2017-07-24
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
15-38
ISSN
  • 1556-1623 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-1631
OpenAlex
W2738454914
Cited by
182
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
FWCI
7.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Metacognition and Learning (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
Keywords
Metacognitive Awareness Inventory, metacognition, metacognitive knowledge, metacognitive regulation, factor structure, instrument validation, item response theory, score calculation, time invariance, undergraduate students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review