Cited by 1Education and experiences of immigrants and refugeesEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningMultilingual Education and Policy

Newly arrived students’ writer agency at the end of preparatory education: writer profiles

Open access
Repo, Elisa, Tarnanen, Mirja, Aalto, Eija·2025·International Journal of Multilingualism

Abstract

Schools socialise students into academic literacy, where writer agency across various genres is important. With increasing linguistic diversity due to global migration, this study provides insight into supporting the writer agency of newly arrived multilingual migrant students. It focuses on 12–17-year-old migrant students (N = 42) at the end of their lower-secondary school preparatory education in Finland, qualitatively identifying and characterising writer profiles regarding the resources for writer agency these students develop. Drawing on a sociocultural understanding of agency, language learning, and writing, as well as the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages, this study analyses two data types: (i) texts written by students as part of a project assessing literacy through language tasks and (ii) background information from students and teachers through a survey. Methodologically, the data were analysed using both theory-informed and data-driven approaches to content analysis, also incorporating linguistic content analysis. The analysis identified writer profiles: (1) well-developing resources for writer agency, (2) moderately developing resources for writer agency, and (3) emerging resources for writer agency. These profiles varied depending on the writer’s background, and the analysis suggested that without agency enablers – such as resources, opportunities, and support systems – written communication appears more challenging.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14790718.2025.2591319

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Ahlholm, M., Väätäinen, E., & Latomaa, S. (2023). Vastasaapuneet ja osallisuuden rakentuminen yhteisissä ja erillisissä luokkahuoneissa. In N. Hynninen, I. Herneaho, E. Sippola, J. Isosävi, & M. Yang (Eds.), Kieli ja osallisuus: AFinLAn vuosikirja 2023 (pp. 17-47). The Finnish Association for Applied Linguistics.
  2. Alanen, R., Huhta, A., Martin, M., Tarnanen, M., Mäntylä, K., Kalaja, P., & Palviainen, Å. (2012). Designing and assessing L2 writing tasks across CEFR proficiency levels. In M. Torrance, D. Alamargot, M. Castelló, F. Ganier, O. Kruse, A. Mangen, L. Tolchinsky, & L. Van Waes (Eds.), Learning to write effectively: Current trends in European research (Studies in Writing, pp. 221- 223). Brill.
  3. Ansala, L., Hämäläinen, U., & Sarvimäki, M. (2020). Age at arrival, parents, and neighborhoods: Understanding the educational attainment of immigrants' children. Journal of Economic Geography, 20, 459-480.
  4. Barton, D., Hamilton, M., & Ivanič, R. (Eds.). (2000). Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context. Routledge.
  5. Gee, J. P. (2015). The new literacy studies. In J. Rowsell & K. Pahl (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of literacy studies (pp. 35-48). Routledge.
  6. Hyland, K. (2001). Second language writing. Cambridge University Press.
  7. Kauppinen, M., Pentikäinen, J., Hankala, M., Kulju, P., Harjunen, E., & Routarinne, S. (2015). Systemaattinen katsaus perusopetusikäisten kirjoittamisen opetusta ja osaamista koskevaan tut- kimukseen. Kasvatus, 46(2), 160-175.
  8. Kern, R. (2000). Literacy and language teaching. Oxford University Press.
  9. Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). Sage.
  10. Kulju, P., Kauppinen, M., Hankala, M., Harjunen, E., Pentikäinen, J., & Routarinne, S. (2017). Reviewing Finnish studies on writing in basic education: Towards pedagogy for diversity. In N. Pyyry, L. Tainio, K. Juuti, R. Vasquez, & M. Paananen (Eds.), Changing subjects, changing pedagogies: Diversities in school and education (pp. 110-127). Finnish Research Association for Subject Didactics. http://hdl.handle.net/10138/231202
  11. Lantolf, J., & Thorne, S. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford University Press.
  12. Lantolf, J. P. (2013). Sociocultural theory and the dialectics of L2 learner autonomy/agency. In P. Benson & L. Cooker (Eds.), The applied linguistic individual: Sociocultural approaches to autonomy, agency and identity (pp. 17-31). Equinox.
  13. Martin, M., Alanen, R., Huhta, A., Kalaja, P., Mäntylä, K., Tarnanen, M., & Palviainen, Å. (2012). CEFLING: Combining second language acquisition and testing approaches to writing. In M. Torrance, D. Alamargot, M. Castelló, F. Ganier, O. Kruse, A. Mangen, L. Tolchinsky, & L. Van Waes (Eds.), Learning to write effectively: Current trends in European research (Studies in Writing, pp. 217- 219).
  14. Korhonen, J. Annala, & P. Kulju (Eds.), Kehittämisen palat, yhteisöjen salat: Näkökulmia koulutuk- seen ja kasvatukseen (pp. 157-180). Tampere University Press.
  15. Prior, P. (2006). A sociocultural theory of writing. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 54-66). The Guilford Press.
  16. Reiman, N., & Mustonen, S. (2010). Yläkoulun suomi toisena kielenä -oppilaiden kirjoittamistaito. Kasvatus, 41(2), 143-153.
  17. Repo, E. (2023). Together towards language-aware schools. Perspectives on supporting increasing lin- guistic diversity [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Turku. https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-29- 9178-5
  18. Roca de Larios, J., Coyle, Y., & Nicolás-Conesa, F. (2016). Focus on writers: Processes and strategies. In R. M. Manchón & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), Handbook of second and foreign language writing (pp. 267- 286). De Gruyter Mouton.
  19. Tarnanen, M., & Aalto, E. (2013). Studying in comprehensive school with low second language writing proficiency. Apples -Journal of Applied Language Studies, 7(1), 83-97. https://apples. journal.fi/article/view/97849.

Authors
Repo, E., Tarnanen, M., & Aalto, E.
Affiliations
University of Jyväskylä (FI)
Corresponding author
Repo, Elisa
Venue
International Journal of Multilingualism
Published
2025-11-24
Pages
1-19
ISSN
  • 1479-0718 (ISSN-L)
  • 1747-7530
OpenAlex
W4416590319
Cited by
0
References
27
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Multilingualism (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Jyväskylä University Digital Archive (University of Jyväskylä) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Research Council of Finland (369363)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and experiences of immigrants and refugees
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
Keywords
writer agency, migrant students, multilingual learners, academic literacy, author profiles, junior high school, preparatory education, linguistic diversity, Common European Framework of Reference for Languages, writing support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review