The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Passing markers: A theory of contextual influence in language comprehension
Open accessAbstract
Most Artificial Intelligence theories of language either assume a syntactic component which serves as “front end” for the rest of the system, or else reject all attempts at distinguishing modules within the comprehension system. In this paper we will present an alternative which, while keeping modularity, will account for several puzzles for typical “syntax first” theories. The major addition to this theory is a “marker passing” (or “spreading activation”) component, which operates in parallel to the normal syntactic component.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing.
Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.82.6.407 · Cited by 8,141
The Hearsay-II Speech-Understanding System: Integrating Knowledge to Resolve Uncertainty
Erman, L. D., Hayes-Roth, F., Lesser, V. R., & Reddy, D. R. (1980) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/356810.356816 · Cited by 1,357
Metadata
- Authors
- CHARNIAK, E.
- Venue
- Cognitive Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1983-09
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 171-190
- ISSN
- 0364-0213 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2013720308
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Passing markers: A theory of contextual influence in language comprehension. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0364-0213(83)80010-x
- The paper
- CHARNIAK, E. (1983). Passing markers: A theory of contextual influence in language comprehension. Cognitive Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0364-0213(83)80010-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
