Cited by 8,141Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismCategorization, perception, and languageMemory Processes and Influences

A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing.

Collins, Allan M., Loftus, Elizabeth F.·1975·Psychological Review

Abstract

This paper presents a spreading-acti vation theory of human semantic processing, which can be applied to a wide range of recent experimental results. The theory is based on Quillian's theory of semantic memory search and semantic preparation, or priming. In conjunction with this, several of the miscondeptions concerning Qullian's theory are discussed. A number of additional assumptions are proposed for his theory in order to apply it to recent experiments. The present paper shows how the extended theory can account for results of several production experiments by Loftus, Juola and Atkinson's multiple-category experiment, Conrad's sentence-verification experiments, and several categorization experiments on the effect of semantic relatedness and typicality by Holyoak and Glass, Rips, Shoben, and Smith, and Rosch. The paper also provides a critique of the Smith, Shoben, and Rips model for categorization judgments. Some years ago, Quillian1 (1962, 1967) proposed a spreading-acti vation theory of human semantic processing that he tried to implement in computer simulations of memory search (Quillian, 1966) and comprehension (Quillian, 1969). The theory viewed memory search as activation spreading from two or more concept nodes in a semantic network until an intersection was found. The effects of preparation (or priming) in semantic memory were also explained in terms of spreading activation from the node of the primed concept. Rather than a theory to explain data, it was a theory d…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-295x.82.6.407

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Human memory retrieval is not a search process, but a propagation of energy; accessing one concept naturally activates semantically, temporally, or causally linked concepts without explicit prompting.

    “which posit that human memory retrieval is not a search process, but a propagation of energy. Accessing one concept naturally activates semantically, temporally, or causally linked concepts without explicit prompting.”

    From Synapse: Empowering LLM Agents with Episodic-Semantic Memory via Spreading Activation (2026) · cites this paper as Collins and Loftus, 1975

  • Human semantic memory models (Collins and Loftus, 1975) inspire the dynamic activation process for prioritizing information.

    “Inspired by human semantic memory models (Collins and Loftus, 1975), we implement a dynamic activation process to prioritize information.”

    From Synapse: Empowering LLM Agents with Episodic-Semantic Memory via Spreading Activation (2026) · cites this paper as Collins and Loftus, 1975

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F.
Venue
Psychological Review
Published
1975-11
Volume
82
Issue
6
Pages
407-428
ISSN
  • 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1471
OpenAlex
W2135255848
Cited by
8,141
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 200 · 2025: 216 · 2024: 190 · 2023: 275 · 2022: 270 · 2021: 264 · 2020: 301 · 2019: 316 · 2018: 260 · 2017: 272 · 2016: 252 · 2015: 312 · 2014: 397 · 2013: 307 · 2012: 288
FWCI
30.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
semantic processing, semantic memory, semantic priming, semantic networks, categorization, typicality, semantic relatedness, sentence verification, production experiment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review