Social Relationships and School Readiness
Abstract
Definitions of school readiness tend to focus on social and academic competencies that children are presumed to need to start school ready to learn. However, a child-focused definition of school readiness is limited because it neither identifies processes that lead children to acquire these competencies, nor does it recognize children's dependence on opportunities within settings that support development of these competencies. The model of school readiness presented in this article broadly defines school readiness as a function of an organized system of interactions and transactions among people (children, teachers, parents, and other caregivers), settings (home, school, and child care), and institutions (communities, neighborhoods, and governments). We propose that the primary mechanisms through which children acquire readiness-related competencies are social relationships children form with peers, parents, and teachers. This perspective on school readiness, emphasizing the mediating role of relational processes, offers guidance for designing interventions to improve school readiness through strengthening relationships between parents and children, parents and teachers, and teachers and children.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
School readiness research now covers multiple interrelated influences on development that are best united under the construct of self-regulation.
“School readiness research now encompasses multiple interrelated influences on children’s development that for the most part are best united under the construct of self-regulation.”
From School Readiness and Self-Regulation: A Developmental Psychobiological Approach (2015) · cites this paper as Mashburn & Pianta 2006
Research has elucidated ways attention and emotion regulation support or constrain learning opportunities partly through facilitation of executive functions and engagement and through relationships with teachers and peers.
“This research has elucidated the ways in which attention and emotion regulation support or constrain opportunities for learning in part through the facilitation of executive functions and engagement in learning and also through relationships with teachers and peers”
From School Readiness and Self-Regulation: A Developmental Psychobiological Approach (2015) · cites this paper as Mashburn & Pianta 2006
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 91 · Cited by 312
- Authors
- Mashburn, A. J., & Pianta, R. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Virginia (US)
- ORCID
- Pianta, Robert C.
- Venue
- Early Education & Development
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-01-03
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 151-176
- ISSN
- 1040-9289 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-6935
- OpenAlex
- W2071358202
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 91
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 55.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Early Education and Development (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Virginia
- Australian Government
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
- Center for Advanced Study, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
- Social Sciences › Education › Parental Involvement in Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Education Methods and Practices
- Keywords
- school readiness, interpersonal relationships, peer relationships, parent-child relationship, teacher-child relationship, relational processes, child development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review