Cited by 33Pharmaceutical Economics and PolicyHealthcare RegulationPharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting

Advancing product quality: a summary of the second FDA/PQRI conference

Open access
Yu, Lawrence X., Akseli, Ilgaz, Allen, Barbara, Amidon, Gregory, Bizjak, Tara Gooen, Boam, Ashley, Caulk, Margaret, Doleski, David +43 more·2016·The AAPS Journal

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1208/s12248-016-9874-5

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Unlike traditional drug formulations, similar physicochemical properties of nano-based pharmaceuticals are often not a predictor of similar in vivo behavior.

    “Unlike in traditional drug formulations, similar physicochemical properties of nano-based pharmaceuticals are not often a predictor of similar in vivo behavior [288, 293, 295]”

    From Polymeric micelles for the delivery of poorly soluble drugs: From nanoformulation to clinical approval. (2020) · cites this paper as [295]

    The “Characterization of Complex Drug Formulations Containing Nanomaterials” section says size alone is insufficient to characterize these products and that other attributes often affect performance. It does not establish that similar physicochemical properties often fail to predict similar in vivo behavior, or make the claimed comparison with traditional formulations. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • There is no distinct or definitive set of critical quality attributes that can accurately predict in vivo similarity of two distinct nano-based pharmaceuticals or biologic products.

    “That is, there is not a distinct or definitive set of critical quality attributes (CQAs), which can accurately predict the in vivo similarity of two distinct nano-based pharmaceuticals or biologic products.”

    From Polymeric micelles for the delivery of poorly soluble drugs: From nanoformulation to clinical approval. (2020) · cites this paper as [295]

    The “Characterization of Complex Drug Formulations Containing Nanomaterials” section says CQAs are product-specific and that attributes beyond size can affect product performance. The “Biosimilar Product Assessment” section likewise describes product-specific assessment of quality attributes. Neither section establishes the stronger claim that no set of CQAs can accurately predict in vivo similarity between two nano-based pharmaceuticals or biologic products. The indexed passages provide no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A wide variety of evidence, including long-term clinical monitoring and extensive PK data, is needed to show equivalence of nano-based pharmaceuticals.

    “Thus, a wide variety of evidence is needed to show equivalence which includes long term clinical monitoring and extensive PK data [288, 293–295].”

    From Polymeric micelles for the delivery of poorly soluble drugs: From nanoformulation to clinical approval. (2020) · cites this paper as [295]

    The section “Characterization of Complex Drug Formulations Containing Nanomaterials” (page unavailable) supports the need to assess multiple product-specific attributes, including size distribution, morphology, drug release, and surface charge. It does not say that long-term clinical monitoring or extensive PK data are needed to demonstrate equivalence of nano-based pharmaceuticals; the PK studies mentioned elsewhere concern biosimilars. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [34]34. International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Re- quirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. ICH Q10: Pharmaceutical Quality System. 2008. http:// www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guide- lines/Quality/Q10/Step4/Q10_Guideline.pdf.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yu, L. X., Akseli, I., Allen, B., Amidon, G., Bizjak, T. G., Boam, A., Caulk, M., Doleski, D., Famulare, J., Fisher, A. C., Furness, S., Hasselbalch, B., Havel, H., Hoag, S. W., Iser, R., Johnson, B. D., Ju, R., Katz, P., Lacana, E., Lee, S. L., Lostritto, R., McNally, G., Mehta, M., Mohan, G., Nasr, M., Nosal, R., Oates, M., O’Connor, T., Polli, J., Raju, G. K., Ramanadham, M., Randazzo, G., Rosencrance, S., Schwendeman, A., Selen, A., Seo, P., Shah, V., Sood, R., Thien, M. P., Tong, T., Trout, B. L., Tyner, K., Vaithiyalingam, S., VanTrieste, M., Walsh, F., Wesdyk, R., Woodcock, J., Wu, G., Wu, L., Yu, L., & Zezza, D.
Affiliations
  • United States Food and Drug Administration (US)
  • Boehringer Ingelheim (United States) (US)
  • Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Roche (United States) (US)
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
  • Perrigo (United States) (US)
  • Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US)
  • GlaxoSmithKline (United States) (US)
  • Pfizer (United States) (US)
  • Teva Pharmaceuticals (United States) (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Amgen (United States) (US)
  • Novartis (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
  • Yu, Lawrence X.
  • Yu, Louis
Venue
The AAPS Journal
Published
2016-02-09
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
528-543
ISSN
1550-7416 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2265041591
Cited by
33
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
9.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The AAPS Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM113832)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Regulation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting
Keywords
FDA, quality risk management, abbreviated new drug application, new drug applications, quality metrics, dissolution testing, continuous production, 3D-printed drugs, biosimilars, quality by design, generic drugs, pharmaceutical quality assurance, regulatory guidelines
MeSH terms
Chemistry, Pharmaceutical, Congresses as Topic, Drug Industry, Humans, Quality Control, United States, United States Food and Drug Administration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review