Cited by 149Nanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryNanotechnology research and applicationsPharmacology and Nanomedicine Research

Nanomedicines: from bench to bedside and beyond.

Havel, Henry, Finch, Gregory, Strode, Pamela, Wolfgang, Marc, Zale, Stephen, Bobe, Iulian, Youssoufian, Hagop, Peterson, Matthew +1 more·2016·The AAPS Journal

Abstract

Advancing nanomedicines from concept to clinic requires integration of new science with traditional pharmaceutical development. The medical and commercial success of nanomedicines is greatly facilitated when those charged with developing nanomedicines are cognizant of the unique opportunities and technical challenges that these products present. These individuals must also be knowledgeable about the processes of clinical and product development, including regulatory considerations, to maximize the odds for successful product registration. This article outlines these topics with a goal to accelerate the combination of academic innovation with collaborative industrial scientists who understand pharmaceutical development and regulatory approval requirements-only together can they realize the full potential of nanomedicines for patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1208/s12248-016-9961-7

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nano-based approach is considered a successful tool for delivery of drugs across the BBB.

    “Currently, nano-based approach is considered as a successful tool for delivery of drugs across BBB (Wong et al., 2012; Tajes et al., 2014; Havel et al., 2016).”

    From Nanotechnology: A Promising Approach for Delivery of Neuroprotective Drugs (2020) · cites this paper as Havel et al., 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Havel, H., Finch, G., Strode, P., Wolfgang, M., Zale, S., Bobe, I., Youssoufian, H., Peterson, M., & Liu, M.
Affiliations
  • Pfizer (United States) (US)
  • Cerulean Pharma (United States) (US)
  • NanoCarrier (Japan) (JP)
  • Amgen (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Havel, Henry
Venue
The AAPS Journal
Published
2016-08-01
Volume
18
Issue
6
Pages
1373-1378
ISSN
1550-7416 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2496476352
Cited by
149
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1
FWCI
5.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The AAPS Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanotechnology research and applications
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Pharmacology and Nanomedicine Research
Keywords
nanomedicine, drug development, clinical development, regulatory approval, product registration, university-industry collaboration, translational research
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Products, Drug Industry, Humans, Drug Delivery Systems, Drug Approval, Nanomedicine, Nanoparticles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review