The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Wicking within forests of micropillars
Open accessAbstract
We describe how a wetting liquid brought into contact with a forest of micropillars impregnates this forest. Both the driving and the viscous forces depend on the parameters of the texture (radius b and height h of the pillars, pitch p of the network) and it is found that two different limits characterize the dynamics of wicking. For small posts ( h < p ), the film progresses all the faster since the posts are high, allowing a simple control of this dynamics. For tall pillars ( h > p ), the speed of impregnation becomes independent of the pillar height, and becomes mainly fixed by the radius of the posts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Chen, J., Dou, R., Cui, D., Zhang, Q., Zhang, Y., Xu, F., Zhou, X., Wang, J., Song, Y., & Jiang, L. (2013) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/am401004t · Cited by 332
Wetting failure of hydrophilic surfaces promoted by surface roughness
Zhao, M.-H., Chen, X.-P., & Wang, Q. (2014) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep05376 · Cited by 88
Metadata
- Authors
- Ishino, C., Reyssat, M., Reyssat, E., Okumura, K., & Quéré, D.
- Venue
- Europhysics Letters (EPL)
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2007-08-08
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 56005
- ISSN
- 0295-5075 (ISSN-L)
- 1286-4854
- OpenAlex
- W1978762987
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Wicking within forests of micropillars. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1209/0295-5075/79/56005
- The paper
- Ishino, C., Reyssat, M., Reyssat, E., Okumura, K., & Quéré, D. (2007). Wicking within forests of micropillars. Europhysics Letters (EPL). https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/79/56005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
