Cited by 35Mechanical and Optical ResonatorsQuantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Mechanics and Applications

Entangling two distant oscillators with a quantum reservoir

Open access
Wolf, A., De Chiara, G., Kajari, E., Lutz, E., Morigi, G.·2011·EPL (Europhysics Letters)

Abstract

The generation of entanglement between two oscillators that interact via a common reservoir is theoretically studied. The reservoir is modeled by a one-dimensional harmonic crystal initially in thermal equilibrium. Starting from a separable state, the oscillators can become entangled after a transient time, that is of the order of the thermalization time scale. This behaviour is observed at finite temperature even when the oscillators are at a distance significantly larger than the crystal's interparticle spacing. The underlying physical mechanisms can be explained by the dynamical properties of the collective variables of the two oscillators which may decouple from or be squeezed by the reservoir. Our predictions can be tested with an ion chain in a linear Paul trap.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1209/0295-5075/95/60008

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Purely Markovian dephasing at the same effective rate leads the dimer to a maximally mixed separable steady state with no long-term entanglement.

    “whereas purely Markovian dynamics governed by Lindblad master equations lead to separable steady states.”

    From Non-Markovianity-Assisted Steady State Entanglement (2012) · cites this paper as [8]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wolf, A., De Chiara, G., Kajari, E., Lutz, E., & Morigi, G.
Affiliations
  • Universität Ulm (DE)
  • University of Augsburg (DE)
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
Venue
EPL (Europhysics Letters)
Published
2011-09-01
Volume
95
Issue
6
Pages
60008
ISSN
  • 0295-5075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1286-4854
OpenAlex
W1987512103
Cited by
35
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Europhysics Letters (EPL) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • European Commission
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • Generalitat de Catalunya (00343)
  • Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Mechanical and Optical Resonators
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Keywords
entanglement generation, coupled oscillators, thermalization, finite temperature, collective variables, squeezing, ion chains, linear Paul trap, open quantum systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review