Cited by 28Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes and associated disorders

Diabetes knowledge and metabolic control in type 1 diabetes starting with continuous glucose monitoring: FUTURE-PEAK

Open access
Broos, Ben, Charleer, Sara, Bolsens, Nancy, Moyson, Carolien, Mathieu, Chantal, Gillard, Pieter, De Block, Christophe·2021·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate whether diabetes knowledge and health literacy impact glycemic control after 1 year of intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) in people with type 1 diabetes ≥ 16 years. Methods: In this prospective real-world cohort study, we assessed diabetes knowledge using a new 10-item questionnaire [Patient Education and Knowledge (PEAK)] and health literacy using the validated 6-item Newest-Vital Sign-D (NVS-D) questionnaire. Primary endpoint was association between PEAK score and change in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). Secondary endpoints were link between NVS-D score and change in HbA1c and that between time spent in/above/below range and PEAK/NVS-D scores. Results: 851 subjects were consecutively recruited between July 2016 and July 2018. Median PEAK score was 8 (range: 0-10), and median NVS-D score was 6 (range 0-6). HbA1c evolved from 7.9% (7.8%-8.0%), 63 (62-64) mmol/mol, at start to 7.7% (7.6%-7.7%), 61 (60-61) mmol/mol (P < 0.001), at 6 months and to 7.8% (7.7%-7.9%), 62 (61-63) mmol/mol, at 12 months (P < 0.001). HbA1c only improved in subgroups with higher scores [PEAK subgroups with score 7-8 (P = 0.005) and 9-10 (P < 0.001) and NVS-D score 4-6 (P < 0.001)]. At 12 months, time spent below 70 mg/dL was reduced by 15% (P < 0.001), and time spent below 54 mg/dL was reduced by 14% (P < 0.001), irrespective of PEAK/NVS-D score. Multiple linear regression analysis demonstrated an association of PEAK score, scan frequency, and baseline HbA1c with evolutions in time in range and time in hyperglycemia. Conclusions: isCGM reduced time in hypoglycemia, and HbA1c evolved favorably. Our findings suggest that diabetes and health literacy affect glucometrics, emphasizing the importance of education.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/clinem/dgab188

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People with diabetes who receive more education about device use achieve better outcomes.

    “Those with more education regarding device use have better outcomes (1,2); therefore, the need for additional education should be periodically assessed, particularly if outcomes are not being met.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 21 · Cited by 28

Authors
Broos, B., Charleer, S., Bolsens, N., Moyson, C., Mathieu, C., Gillard, P., & De Block, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Antwerp (BE)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Metabolism, University of Antwerp–Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
2021-03-19
Volume
106
Issue
8
Pages
e3037-e3048
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W3137072274
Cited by
28
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1
FWCI
3.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Pfizer
  • AstraZeneca
  • Sanofi
  • KU Leuven
  • Novo Nordisk
  • Janssen Pharmaceuticals
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, diabetes knowledge, health literacy, glycemic control, HbA1c, time in range, hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, scan frequency, adolescents and adults, patient education, diabetes self-management education
MeSH terms
Glycemic Control, Adult, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Health Literacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review