Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 469

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Dopamine Agonists and Pituitary Tumor Shrinkage

BEVAN, JOHN S., WEBSTER, JONATHAN, Burke, Christopher W., Scanlon, Maurice F.·1992·Endocrine Reviews

Abstract

The primary aim of this review has been to clarify the tumor shrinking effects of dopamine agonists on pituitary macroadenomas of different cell types. Shrinkage is most dramatic for macroprolactinomas and is due to cell size reduction. Seventy-nine percent of 271 definite macroprolactinomas were reduced in size by at least 25%, and 89% shrank to some degree. Most shrinkage occurs during the first 3 months of treatment, although in a minority shrinkage is delayed. Dopamine agonist resistance during long-term therapy is exceptional. Drug withdrawal nearly always leads to a return of hyperprolactinemia, even after several years treatment, although early tumor reexpansion is unusual. About 10% of true macroprolactinomas do not shrink with dopamine agonists; the molecular mechanisms of such resistance have yet to be determined. Alternative formulations of BC and new dopamine agonists (CV 205-502 and cabergoline) are useful for the minority of patients unable to tolerate oral BC, but do not seem to further improve overall shrinkage rates. The risks of pregnancy have probably been overstated, and BC is suitable primary treatment for women with prolactinomas of all sizes; the drug can be used safely during pregnancy in the event of clinically relevant tumor expansion. The interpretation of different degrees of hyperprolactinemia is discussed and management strategies suggested. Most patients with macroprolactinomas now avoid surgery, but drug-induced, time-dependent tumor fibrosis should be remembered if surgery is contemplated. Nonfunctioning pituitary tumors are mostly of gonadotroph cell origin and may be associated with significant disconnection hyperprolactinaemia. Seventy-six of 84 well-characterized tumors showed no tumor shrinkage during dopamine agonist therapy. Possible explanations include abnormalities of dopamine receptor number and function. Preliminary evidence suggests that dopamine agonists may restrain the growth of some functionless tumors; most of these tumors, however, can be satisfactorily debulked using transsphenoidal surgery. In contrast to macroprolactinomas, other functioning pituitary tumors (GH-, TSH-, and ACTH-secreting) rarely shrink during dopamine agonist therapy, although the number of tumors studied is small.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/edrv-13-2-220

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 469

Metadata

Authors
BEVAN, J. S., WEBSTER, J., Burke, C. W., & Scanlon, M. F.
Venue
Endocrine Reviews
Published
1992-05
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
220-240
ISSN
  • 0163-769X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7189
OpenAlex
W2049486103
Cited by
469
References
0
FWCI
5.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dopamine Agonists and Pituitary Tumor Shrinkage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/edrv-13-2-220
The paper
BEVAN, J. S., WEBSTER, J., Burke, C. W., & Scanlon, M. F. (1992). Dopamine Agonists and Pituitary Tumor Shrinkage. Endocrine Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1210/edrv-13-2-220

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.