The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Insulin-Like Growth Factors and Their Binding Proteins: Biological Actions*
Abstract
THE insulin-like growth factors were discovered on the basis of their ability to stimulate cartilage sulfation and to replace the “sulfation factor activity” of GH, as determined using an in vivo assay, in an in vitro test system (1). The biological significance of this finding was quickly expanded beyond the study of cartilage sulfation to include stimulation of DNA synthesis (2), proteoglycan synthesis (3), glycosaminoglycan synthesis (4), and protein synthesis (5). Most of these studies used tissue preparations such as isolated diaphragm, cartilage, or epididymal fat pads to study biologicalactivity. In recognition of its generalized pleiotypic actions, in the early 1970's sulfation factor was renamed somatomedin (mediator of the effects of somatotropin) and was included in the emerging classification of broad spectrum growth factors along with platelet derived growth factor, fibroblast growth factor, and epidermal growth factor (6). During the period in which the biological actions of sulfation factor were being characterized, parallel studies were initiated that attempted to define factors in serum that could stimulate insulin-like effects. Because these factors were known to be distinct from immunoreactive insulin, their bioassay was based on insulin-like actions that could not be abolished by the simultaneous addition of anti-insulin antibody, and the factors were termed nonsuppressible insulin-like activity (NSILA) (7). Initial biological studies of both NSILA and somatomedin were based on the use of crude serum extracts. Early attempts to extract these factors from tissues were generally not successful, and by 1970 it had been concluded that no concentrated organ source for them existed (8). However, highly purified preparations of both factors were prepared from serum extracts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Satellite Cells and the Muscle Stem Cell Niche
Yin, H., Price, F., & Rudnicki, M. A. (2013) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00043.2011 · Cited by 2,166
Renehan, A. G., Zwahlen, M., Minder, C., O'Dwyer, S. T., Shalet, S. M., & Egger, M. (2004) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(04)16044-3 · Cited by 1,697
The Somatomedin Hypothesis: 2001
Le Roith, D., Bondy, C., Yakar, S., Liu, J.-L., & Butler, A. (2001) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/edrv.22.1.0419 · Cited by 1,257
Insulin, Insulin-Like Growth Factors and Colon Cancer: A Review of the Evidence
Giovannucci, E. (2001) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/131.11.3109s · Cited by 959
Sjögren, K., Liu, J.-L., Blad, K., Skrtic, S., Vidal, O., Wallenius, V., LeRoith, D., Törnell, J., Isaksson, O. G. P., Jansson, J.-O., et al. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.12.7088 · Cited by 938
Metadata
- Authors
- JONES, J. I., & CLEMMONS, D. R.
- Venue
- Endocrine Reviews
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 1995-02
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-34
- ISSN
- 0163-769X (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7189
- OpenAlex
- W2072514327
- Cited by
- 4,710
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 159.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Insulin-Like Growth Factors and Their Binding Proteins: Biological Actions*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/edrv-16-1-3
- The paper
- JONES, J. I., & CLEMMONS, D. R. (1995). Insulin-Like Growth Factors and Their Binding Proteins: Biological Actions*. Endocrine Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1210/edrv-16-1-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.