The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Osteoporosis in Men
Abstract
ALTHOUGH osteoporosis has long been considered a disease of women, in the earliest reports of the epidemiology of osteoporosis it was apparent that the classical age-related increase in fractures seen in women is evident in men as well. Only in the last few years has it been recognized that the problem of osteoporosis in men represents an important public health issue and that it presents a unique array of scientific challenges and opportunities (1–3). Here we examine the issue of osteoporosis in men and compare its pathophysiology and clinical presentation with parallel processes in women. Women exhibit a dramatic increase in bone mass that begins during adolescence and is almost complete when puberty ends (4). In men, a similar relationship of bone mass accretion to adolescence holds, but the chronological onset of puberty is later in men than women, and the achievement of peak bone mass is also later. As a result of diverging growth trends (primarily during puberty), there are obvious sexual differences in adult skeletal morphology. The development of adult bone mass is dependent upon changes in both density and size, but sexual differences are, for the most part, related to differences in size. Skeletal dimensions in men are larger than those in women. For example, radial width and cortical thickness are considerably larger in men (5), femoral neck cross-sectional area is larger (6), and vertebral body cross-sectional area is larger (7). As a result, total body bone mineral is greater in men (3100-3500 g in young men vs. 2300–2700 g in young women) (8, 9). Although maximal adult mineral density is also frequently reported to be greater in men, this is primarily an artifact of the methods used for its measurement.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Prevalence of Low Femoral Bone Density in Older U.S. Adults from NHANES III
Looker, A. C., Orwoll, E. S., Johnston, C. C., Lindsay, R. L., Wahner, H. W., Dunn, W. L., Calvo, M. S., Harris, T. B., & Heyse, S. P. (1997) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.11.1761 · Cited by 1,051
Self-citationLong-term effect of testosterone therapy on bone mineral density in hypogonadal men
Behre, H. M., Kliesch, S., Leifke, E., Link, T. M., & Nieschlag, E. (1997) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jcem.82.8.4163 · Cited by 559
Andropause: clinical implications of the decline in serum testosterone levels with aging in men
Matsumoto, A. M. (2002) · The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences · doi:10.1093/gerona/57.2.m76 · Cited by 490
Update: Hypogonadotropic Hypogonadism in Type 2 Diabetes and Obesity
Dandona, P., & Dhindsa, S. (2011) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2010-2724 · Cited by 313
Long-term and sequential treatment for osteoporosis
Foessl, I., Dimai, H. P., & Obermayer-Pietsch, B. (2023) · Nature Reviews Endocrinology · doi:10.1038/s41574-023-00866-9 · Cited by 273
Metadata
- Authors
- ORWOLL, E. S., & KLEIN, R. F.
- Venue
- Endocrine Reviews
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 1995-02
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 87-116
- ISSN
- 0163-769X (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7189
- OpenAlex
- W4243952167
- Cited by
- 335
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Osteoporosis in Men. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/edrv-16-1-87
- The paper
- ORWOLL, E. S., & KLEIN, R. F. (1995). Osteoporosis in Men. Endocrine Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1210/edrv-16-1-87
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.