The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tamoxifen, Raloxifene, and the Prevention of Breast Cancer*
Abstract
IN 1896, George Beatson demonstrated that the removal of the ovaries from premenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer could, in some cases, cause regression of the disease and improve the prognosis of the patient (1). However, by 1900 Stanley Boyd had established that only one in three patients would obtain improvement for about 1 yr (2). Despite this disappointment, a link was established between an ovarian factor and the growth of some breast cancers. This observation was to become the foundation of modern clinical practice and the rationale for the use of antiestrogens to treat breast cancer (3, 4). At the turn of the century, studies were being conducted in the laboratory to complement the clinical effort. Inbred strains of mice were being established for medical research, and it was found that certain strains of mice developed a high incidence of mammary tumors. Lathrop and Loeb (5) reported that an early ovariectomy could prevent the spontaneous development of tumors but it was not until Allen and Doisey (6) identified “estrus stimulating principle” that ovarian hormones could be linked to the development of breast cancer. By 1936, Professor Antoine Lacassagne, again working with high-incidence strains of mice, suggested that if breast cancer was caused by a special hereditary sensitivity to estrogen, then the disease could be prevented by developing a therapeutic antagonist to estrogen action in the breast (7). However, there were no therapeutic antagonists of estrogen at that time, nor was there a target to design drug molecules. Nevertheless, exciting developments in the discovery of nonsteroidal estrogens would establish the structural basis of carrier molecules, which resulted in the design of the two drugs, tamoxifen and raloxifene (Fig. 1), both originally described as antiestrogens and used today in a clinical trial to prevent breast cancer in high-risk women (see Section IX).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gail, M. H., Brinton, L. A., Byar, D. P., Corle, D. K., Green, S. B., Schairer, C., & Mulvihill, J. J. (1989) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/81.24.1879 · Cited by 3,334
Cited by
The Multifaceted Mechanisms of Estradiol and Estrogen Receptor Signaling
Hall, J. M., Couse, J. F., & Korach, K. S. (2001) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.r100029200 · Cited by 1,208
Jordan, V. C. (2003) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm020449y · Cited by 414
Self-citationChemoprevention: an essential approach to controlling cancer
Sporn, M. B., & Suh, N. (2002) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc844 · Cited by 379
Coregulators in Nuclear Estrogen Receptor Action: From Concept to Therapeutic Targeting
Hall, J. M. (2005) · Molecular Interventions · doi:10.1124/mi.5.6.7 · Cited by 295
Ju, Y. H., Allred, K. F., Allred, C. D., & Helferich, W. G. (2006) · Carcinogenesis · doi:10.1093/carcin/bgi370 · Cited by 129
Metadata
- Authors
- Jordan, V. C., & Morrow, M.
- Venue
- Endocrine Reviews
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 1999-06-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 253-278
- ISSN
- 0163-769X (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7189
- OpenAlex
- W2133249365
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tamoxifen, Raloxifene, and the Prevention of Breast Cancer*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/edrv.20.3.0368
- The paper
- Jordan, V. C., & Morrow, M. (1999). Tamoxifen, Raloxifene, and the Prevention of Breast Cancer*. Endocrine Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1210/edrv.20.3.0368
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.