Cited by 366Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

Oxytocin–dopamine interactions mediate variations in maternal behavior in the rat

Open access
Shahrokh, Dara K., Zhang, Tie-Yuan, Diorio, Josie, Gratton, Alain, Meaney, Michael J.·2010·Endocrinology

Abstract

Variations in maternal behavior among lactating rats associate with differences in estrogen-oxytocin interactions in the medial preoptic area (mPOA) and in dopamine levels in the nucleus accumbens (nAcc). Thus, stable, individual differences in pup licking/grooming (LG) are abolished by oxytocin receptor blockade or treatments that eliminate differences in the nAcc dopamine signal. We provide novel evidence for a direct effect of oxytocin at the level of the ventral tegmental area (VTA) in the regulation of nAcc dopamine levels. Mothers that exhibit consistently increased pup LG (i.e. high LG mothers) by comparison with low LG mothers show increased oxytocin expression in the mPOA and the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus and increased projections of oxytocin-positive cells from both mPOA and paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus to the VTA. Direct infusion of oxytocin into the VTA increased the dopamine signal in the nAcc. Finally, high compared with low LG mothers show greater increases in dopamine signal in the nAcc during bouts of pup LG, and this difference is abolished with infusions of an oxytocin receptor antagonist directly into the VTA. These studies reveal a direct effect of oxytocin on dopamine release within the mesocorticolimbic dopamine system and are consistent with previous reports of oxytocin-dopamine interactions in the establishment and maintenance of social bonds.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/en.2009-1271

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Following birth, activity in the mesolimbic dopamine system drives continuous interactions with offspring, including retrieval, licking, and grooming of pups.

    “Following birth, activity in the mesolimbic dopamine (DA) system drives continuous interactions with offspring, including retrieval, licking, and grooming of pups [29,30].”

    From The Neurobiology of Love and Pair Bonding from Human and Animal Perspectives (2023) · cites this paper as [30]

    In “Differences between high and low” (page unavailable), the paper links mesolimbic dopamine activity to mother–pup interactions and says nucleus accumbens dopamine might mediate pup licking/grooming and likely retrieval. The citing sentence overstates this qualified account by saying dopamine activity drives continuous interactions; the paper does not establish that the interactions are continuous. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In Long-Evans rats, an intra-VTA infusion of OXT increased DA release in the NAc of virgin females, whereas an OXTR antagonist significantly decreased DA release in the NAc of lactating females.

    “In Long-Evans rats, an intra-VTA infusion of OXT increased DA release in the NAc of virgin females, whereas an OXTR antagonist significantly decreased DA release in the NAc of lactating females”

    From Convergence of oxytocin and dopamine signalling in neuronal circuits: Insights into the neurobiology of social interactions across species (2024) · cites this paper as Shahrokh et al., 2010

    The Animals and maternal behavior section identifies the rats as Long-Evans, and Fig. 3 reports increased nucleus accumbens dopamine signals after intra-VTA oxytocin infusion in virgin females. The results section reports that intra-VTA oxytocin receptor antagonist significantly attenuated licking/grooming-related dopamine increases in high-LG lactating mothers, but had no effect in low-LG mothers. The claim omits that limitation and makes the antagonist result sound general to lactating females. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Maternal rats exhibiting high levels of pup licking and grooming behavior tend to exhibit larger increases in dopaminergic activity in the nucleus accumbens as a result of grooming their pups relative to their low licking and grooming counterparts.

    “Maternal rats exhibiting high levels of pup licking and grooming behavior tend to exhibit larger increases in dopaminergic activity in the nucleus accumbens as a result of grooming their pups relative to their low licking and grooming counterparts (Shahrokh et al., 2010, Champagne et al., 2004).”

    From Oxytocin, motivation and the role of dopamine (2014) · cites this paper as Shahrokh et al., 2010

  • Oxytocin infusions into the VTA can enhance dopamine levels in the nucleus accumbens.

    “utilizing in vivo voltammetry, Shahrokh and colleagues demonstrated that oxytocin infusions into the VTA could enhance dopamine levels in the nucleus accumbens (Shahrokh et al., 2010).”

    From Oxytocin, motivation and the role of dopamine (2014) · cites this paper as Shahrokh et al., 2010

  • Mother rats displaying high levels of pup grooming behavior show an increased number of oxytocinergic projections from the PVN to the VTA relative to rats exhibiting low levels of pup grooming behavior.

    “Mother rats displaying high levels of pup grooming behavior show an increased number oxytocinergic projections from the PVN to the VTA relative to rats exhibiting low levels of pup grooming behavior (Shahrokh et al., 2010).”

    From Oxytocin, motivation and the role of dopamine (2014) · cites this paper as Shahrokh et al., 2010

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 67 · Cited by 366

Authors
Shahrokh, D. K., Zhang, T.-Y., Diorio, J., Gratton, A., & Meaney, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Douglas Mental Health University Institute (CA)
  • Sackler Program for Epigenetics and Psychobiology at McGill University, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, McGill University, Montréal, Canada H4H 1R3
Corresponding author
Meaney, Michael J.
Venue
Endocrinology
Published
2010-03-12
Volume
151
Issue
5
Pages
2276-2286
ISSN
  • 0013-7227 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7170
OpenAlex
W2145936102
Cited by
366
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 17
FWCI
33.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
McGill University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
oxytocin, dopamine, maternal behavior, ventral tegmental area, nucleus accumbens, medial preoptic area, paraventricular nucleus, oxytocin receptor, mesocorticolimbic dopamine system, lactating rats, individual differences, social bonding
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Animals, Animals, Newborn, Dopamine, Female, Grooming, Male, Maternal Behavior, Nucleus Accumbens, Oxytocics, Oxytocin, Paraventricular Hypothalamic Nucleus, Preoptic Area, Signal Transduction, Ventral Tegmental Area, Receptors, Oxytocin, Rats, Long-Evans, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review