Cited by 51Reproductive Physiology in LivestockReproductive Biology and FertilityOvarian function and disorders

Angiotensin II Signaling Promotes Follicle Growth and Dominance in Cattle

Ferreira, Rogério, Gasperin, Bernardo, Rovani, Monique, Santos, Joabel, Barreta, Marcos, Bohrer, Rodrigo, Price, Christopher, Bayard Dias Gonçalves, Paulo·2011·Endocrinology

Abstract

It is generally understood that angiotensin II (AngII) promotes follicle atresia in rats, although recent data suggested that this may not be true in cattle. In this study, we aimed to determine in vivo whether AngII alters follicle development in cattle, using intrafollicular injection of AngII or antagonist into the growing dominant follicle or the second largest subordinate follicle. Injection of saralasin, an AngII antagonist, into the growing dominant follicle inhibited follicular growth, and this inhibitory effect was overcome by systemic FSH supplementation. Injection of AngII into the dominant follicle did not affect follicular growth, whereas injection of AngII into the second largest follicle prevented the expected atresia of this subordinate follicle, and the treated follicle grew at the same rate as the dominant follicle for the next 24 h. Inhibition of AngII action in the dominant follicle decreased estradiol concentrations in follicular fluid and the abundance of mRNA encoding aromatase, 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase, LH receptor, and cyclinD2 in granulosa cells, with minimal effects on theca cells. The effect of AngII on aromatase mRNA levels was confirmed using an in vitro granulosa cell culture system. In conclusion, these data suggest that AngII signaling promotes follicle growth in cattle and does so by regulating genes involved in estradiol secretion and granulosa cell proliferation and differentiation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/en.2011-1146

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ferreira, R., Gasperin, B., Rovani, M., Santos, J., Barreta, M., Bohrer, R., Price, C., & Bayard Dias Gonçalves, P.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (BR)
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
  • Laboratório de Biotecnologia e Reprodução Animal (R.F., B.G., M.R., J.S., M.B., R.B., P.B.D.G.), Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, 97105-900 Santa Maria, Brazil
Venue
Endocrinology
Published
2011-10-18
Volume
152
Issue
12
Pages
4957-4965
ISSN
  • 0013-7227 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7170
OpenAlex
W2045672038
Cited by
51
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
7.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Reproductive Physiology in Livestock
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
Keywords
angiotensin II, folliculogenesis, follicle dominance, follicular atresia, cattle, saralasin, follicle-stimulating hormone, estradiol secretion, aromatase, granulosa cells, luteinizing hormone receptor, cyclin D2, 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase
MeSH terms
Angiotensin II, Animals, Aromatase, Cattle, Cell Differentiation, Estradiol, Female, Gene Expression Regulation, Ovarian Follicle, Granulosa Cells, Saralasin, Signal Transduction, Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers, Cell Proliferation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review