Cited by 31MicroRNA in disease regulationGenetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal AbnormalitiesGrowth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors

Functional Roles of Sex-Biased, Growth Hormone–Regulated MicroRNAs miR-1948 and miR-802 in Young Adult Mouse Liver

Open access
Hao, Pengying, Waxman, David J·2018·Endocrinology

Abstract

Sex-specific temporal patterns of pituitary growth hormone (GH) secretion determine the sex-biased transcription of hundreds of genes in the liver and impart important sex differences in liver physiology, metabolism, and disease. Sex differences in hepatic gene expression vary widely, ranging from less than twofold to >1000-fold in the mouse. Here, we use small RNA sequencing to discover 24 sex-biased mouse liver microRNAs (miRNAs), and then investigate the roles of two of these miRNAs in GH-regulated liver sex differences. Studies in prepubertal and young adult mice, and in mice in which pituitary hormones are ablated or where sex-specific hepatic GH signaling is dysregulated, demonstrated that the male-biased miR-1948 and the female-biased miR-802 are both regulated by sex-specific pituitary GH secretory patterns, acquire sex specificity at puberty, and are dependent on the GH-activated transcription factor STAT5 for their sex-specific expression. Both miRNAs are within genomic regions characterized by sex-biased chromatin accessibility. miR-1948, an uncharacterized miRNA, has essential features for correct Drosha/Dicer processing, generates a bona fide mature miRNA with strong strand bias for the 5p arm, and is bound by Argonaute in liver tissue, as is miR-802. In vivo studies using inhibitory locked nucleic acid sequences revealed that miR-1948-5p preferentially represses female-biased messenger RNAs (mRNAs) and induces male-biased mRNAs in male liver; conversely, miR-802…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/en.2017-03109

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hao, P., & Waxman, D. J.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Waxman, David J
Venue
Endocrinology
Published
2018-01-16
Volume
159
Issue
3
Pages
1377-1392
ISSN
  • 0013-7227 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7170
OpenAlex
W2782775581
Cited by
31
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6
FWCI
1.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (DK033765)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › MicroRNA in disease regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors
Keywords
miR-802, sex-biased gene expression, liver, growth hormone, pituitary gland, STAT5, sex differences, puberty, microRNA biogenesis, Argonaute proteins, cytochrome P450, microRNA target regulation, young adult mice
MeSH terms
Animals, Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System, Female, Gene Expression Regulation, Liver, Male, Mice, Inbred ICR, RNA, Messenger, Sex Characteristics, Growth Hormone, Gene Expression, Mice, Knockout, MicroRNAs, STAT5 Transcription Factor, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review