Cited by 484MicroRNA in disease regulationDevelopmental Biology and Gene RegulationPlant Molecular Biology Research

Most Caenorhabditis elegans microRNAs Are Individually Not Essential for Development or Viability

Open access
Miska, Eric A, Alvarez-Saavedra, Ezequiel, Abbott, Allison L, Lau, Nelson C, Hellman, Andrew B, McGonagle, Shannon M, Bartel, David P, Ambros, Victor R +1 more·2007·PLoS Genetics

Abstract

MicroRNAs (miRNAs), a large class of short noncoding RNAs found in many plants and animals, often act to post-transcriptionally inhibit gene expression. We report the generation of deletion mutations in 87 miRNA genes in Caenorhabditis elegans, expanding the number of mutated miRNA genes to 95, or 83% of known C. elegans miRNAs. We find that the majority of miRNAs are not essential for the viability or development of C. elegans, and mutations in most miRNA genes do not result in grossly abnormal phenotypes. These observations are consistent with the hypothesis that there is significant functional redundancy among miRNAs or among gene pathways regulated by miRNAs. This study represents the first comprehensive genetic analysis of miRNA function in any organism and provides a unique, permanent resource for the systematic study of miRNAs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030215

Cites

106 of 106 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Co-targeting among family members may help explain the robustness of miRNA regulatory networks and their resilience to mutations of individual miRNAs in knockout experiments.

    “which may help to explain the robustness of miRNA regulatory networks and their resilience to mutations of individual miRNAs in knockout experiments (Miska et al., 2007).”

    From Scalable and deep profiling of mRNA targets for individual microRNAs with chimeric eCLIP (2022) · cites this paper as Miska et al., 2007

    The Discussion section, “Redundancy of miRNAs and Their Regulatory Pathways” (page unavailable), proposes that miRNA family members may act redundantly, which could explain why individual mutations often lack striking effects. It does not establish co-targeting among family members or demonstrate robustness of miRNA regulatory networks generally. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 111 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Ruby JG Stark A Johnston W Kellis M Bartel DP 2007 Biogenesis, expression, and target predictions for an expanded set of microRNA genes in Drosophila Genome Res In press. PMC2099593 17989254
  2. Wood WB and the Community of C. elegans Researchers 1988 The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans Cold Spring Harbor, New York Cold Spring Harbor Press
  3. Fixsen WD 1985 The genetic control of hypodermal cell lineages during nematode development [Ph.D.]. Cambridge Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miska, E. A., Alvarez-Saavedra, E., Abbott, A. L., Lau, N. C., Hellman, A. B., McGonagle, S. M., Bartel, D. P., Ambros, V. R., & Horvitz, H. R.
Affiliations
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research (US)
Corresponding author
Horvitz, H. Robert
Venue
PLoS Genetics
Published
2007-12-14
Volume
3
Issue
12
Pages
e215
ISSN
  • 1553-7390 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7404
OpenAlex
W2003952411
Cited by
484
References
111
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 60
FWCI
9.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • e-Publications@Marquette (Marquette University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Ellison Medical Foundation
  • Wellcome Trust (061641)
  • National Institutes of Health (5f32gm065721-03)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM067031, R01GM067031, 5F32GM065721-02, GM34028, R01GM034028, F32 GM065721)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › MicroRNA in disease regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
Keywords
microRNA, Caenorhabditis elegans, post-transcriptional regulation
MeSH terms
Animals, Mutation, Phenotype, Conserved Sequence, Caenorhabditis elegans, Genes, Helminth, Sequence Deletion, RNA, Helminth, Evolution, Molecular, MicroRNAs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review