Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 315

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Immunocytochemical Study of Mammalian Progesterone Receptor Using Monoclonal Antibodies*

PERROT-APPLANAT, M., LOGEAT, F., GROYER-PICARD, M. T., MILGROM, E.·1985·Endocrinology

Abstract

Five monoclonal antibodies were used for the immunocytochemical study of mammalian progesterone receptor (PR). Initial studies were aimed at defining the optimal experimental conditions for the detection of the receptor, with special emphasis on techniques likely to be used in clinical determinations and in immunoelectron microscopic localization. Specific immunoperoxidase staining was observed either in fixed, frozen sections or in sections of paraffin-embedded tissue. The latter method allowed a better preservation of cellular structures. Among the eight fixatives tested, glutaraldehyde, picric-acid formaldehyde, and paraformaldehyde proved satisfactory. Both indirect immunoperoxidase and the indirect antibody peroxidase-antiperoxidase methods could be used. In immature rabbits or castrated guinea pigs primed by estrogen, i.e. in conditions where its ligand was absent (or present in very low concentration), the PR was confined to the nucleus of immunoreactive cells. This was the case for all the cell types of the endometrium and the myometrium, for the immunostained cells of the oviduct, cervix, vagina, pituitary gland, and for the very weakly stained cells in the liver. No staining was observed in nontarget tissues for progesterone, such as diaphragm, spleen, and small intestine. Nuclear staining was also absent when various control antibodies replaced anti-PR antibodies. This result thus generalizes the observations made on the estrogen receptor, showing that there is no translocation of the receptor from cytoplasm to nucleus under the influence of the hormone. Moreover, a marked heterogeneity in immunostaining was observed among cells of the same type in several tissues, suggesting that there could be large differences in the hormonal sensitivity of individual cells. Cellular distribution of PR immunoreactivity was studied in the uterus, cervix, oviduct, and pituitary gland of rabbits and in the uterus and vagina of guinea pigs. A labeling was observed in all the cell types of the uterus (luminal and glandular epithelium, stroma, and muscularis). In the cervix, nuclear immunostaining was observed in the connective tissue of the lamina propria and in some epithelial and muscle cells. In the vagina, PR immunoreactivity was seen in the basal layers of the stratified squamous epithelium, in the connective tissue of the lamina propria, and in the smooth muscle. In the oviduct, the luminal epithelium, the connective tissue, and the muscularis were stained. In the pituitary gland, selective nuclear labeling was observed in a few scattered cells.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/endo-116-4-1473

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 315

Metadata

Authors
PERROT-APPLANAT, M., LOGEAT, F., GROYER-PICARD, M. T., & MILGROM, E.
Venue
Endocrinology
Published
1985-04
Volume
116
Issue
4
Pages
1473-1484
ISSN
  • 0013-7227 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7170
OpenAlex
W2039187716
Cited by
315
References
0
FWCI
22.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Immunocytochemical Study of Mammalian Progesterone Receptor Using Monoclonal Antibodies*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/endo-116-4-1473
The paper
PERROT-APPLANAT, M., LOGEAT, F., GROYER-PICARD, M. T., & MILGROM, E. (1985). Immunocytochemical Study of Mammalian Progesterone Receptor Using Monoclonal Antibodies*. Endocrinology. https://doi.org/10.1210/endo-116-4-1473

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.