Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 370

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Lengthening the Bovine Estrous Cycle with Low Levels of Exogenous Progesterone: A Model for Studying Ovarian Follicular Dominance*

SIROIS, J., FORTUNE, J. E.·1990·Endocrinology

Abstract

In cattle the development of ovarian follicles greater than or equal to 5 mm occurs in waves, with either two or three waves per estrous cycle. To increase our understanding of the control of follicular dynamics in cattle, the present study was designed to characterize the pattern of follicular development during artificially lengthened estrous cycles. Cycles were lengthened by intravaginal insertion of Silastic devices containing progesterone [Controlled Internal Drug Release devices (CIDRs)]. Control heifers (group 1) received blank devices, whereas treated heifers received one (group 2) or two CIDRs (group 3) from days 14 to 28 after estrus. In groups 2 and 3, the insertion of CIDRs prevented return to estrus at the normal time and increased cycle length as compared to the control group (30.0 +/- 0.0 and 31.0 +/- 0.3 vs. 21.0 +/- 0.7 days, respectively, P less than 0.05). After natural luteolysis and between days 22 and 28 of cycle, progesterone concentrations were maintained at lower levels in group 2 (range = 0.9-2.1 ng/ml) than in group 3 (range = 3.7-4.9 ng/ml, P less than 0.003). Follicular development and regression were monitored daily by ultrasonography. The number of follicular waves per cycle was identical in groups 1 and 2 (2.7 waves per cycle), despite the significantly longer cycles in group 2. In group 2, the presence of one CIDR altered the normal pattern of follicular development by promoting the prolonged growth of the ovulatory follicle, and associated with it, a complete absence of follicular recruitment. When compared to ovulatory follicles in controls (group 1), ovulatory follicles in group 2 were detected on the ovaries for a longer time (1.8-fold), reached a greater maximal size (1.4-fold), and were dominant for a longer time (3-fold). Heifers in group 3 had significantly more follicular waves per cycle than groups 1 and 2 (3.8 vs. 2.7 waves per cycle, respectively, P less than 0.05), due to the production of additional follicular waves during the lengthened cycle in three of six heifers. The other three heifers in group 3 showed patterns of follicular development similar to those of group 2. All heifers in the control group had normal preovulatory rises in estradiol and LH. During the period of treatment (days 14-28), 17 beta-estradiol concentrations were higher in heifers in group 2 (lower progesterone levels) than in heifers in group 3 (higher progesterone levels; P less than 0.0001). No differences were observed in basal LH concentrations between groups 2 and 3.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/endo-127-2-916

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 370

Metadata

Authors
SIROIS, J., & FORTUNE, J. E.
Venue
Endocrinology
Published
1990-08
Volume
127
Issue
2
Pages
916-925
ISSN
  • 0013-7227 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7170
OpenAlex
W1983803604
Cited by
370
References
0
FWCI
27.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lengthening the Bovine Estrous Cycle with Low Levels of Exogenous Progesterone: A Model for Studying Ovarian Follicular Dominance*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/endo-127-2-916
The paper
SIROIS, J., & FORTUNE, J. E. (1990). Lengthening the Bovine Estrous Cycle with Low Levels of Exogenous Progesterone: A Model for Studying Ovarian Follicular Dominance*. Endocrinology. https://doi.org/10.1210/endo-127-2-916

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.