Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 273

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of Persistent Follicles on Early Embryonic Losses in Beef Cows1

Ahmad, Nasim, Neal Schrick, F., Butcher, Roy L., Keith Inskeep, E.·1995·Biology of Reproduction

Abstract

Low doses of progestogens in regimens for synchronization of estrus result in persistent follicles (PF) and reduced conception rates in cattle. The effects of PF on recovery of oocytes/embryos, fertilization, and embryonic development were examined in beef cows. To produce PF, cows received a used Controlled Internal Drug Releasing device on Days 4 through 13 after pretreatment estrus (Day 0) and two injections of 20 mg prostaglandin (PG) F2α, i.m., 12 h apart on Day 6 (PF; n = 20). Control cows received only PGF2α on Day 6 so they would ovulate growing follicles (GF; n = 22). With this model, the largest (dominant) follicle from the first wave of follicular development was being ovulated in cows in each group. Cows were observed for estrus twice daily and were then mated to highly fertile bulls. Follicular development was monitored by ultrasonography on alternate days from Day 2 until estrus and then daily until apparent ovulation. Jugular blood samples were collected every other day from Day 2 through 6 days after mating at posttreatment estrus, when uteri were flushed nonsurgically. The ovulatory follicle, which was followed retrospectively and had been observed longer (14 ± 1 vs. 8 ± 1 days), was larger in PF (17.2 ± 0.5 mm) than in GF (14.5 ± 0.6 mm; p < 0.01). Mean estradiol-17β (E2) in jugular plasma during the 6 days before estrus was higher in PF than in GF (5.7 ± 0.4 vs. 2.6 ± 0.4 pg/ml;p < 0.01). Recovery of oocytes/embryos was lower (70%) in PF than in GF (90%; p < 0.05). Fertilization rate (97% ) and mean numbers of accessory sperm in the zona pellucida (38 ± 12), for recovered oocytes/ embryos, did not differ with treatment. Fewer embryos had reached ≥ 16-cell stage of development in PF ( 14% ) and were good morulae (14%) than in GF (86% and 73%, respectively; p < 0.01). Death of embryos in cows with PF could be due to the effects of elevated E, on either oocyte maturation or oviductal function.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1095/biolreprod52.5.1129

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Cited by

See all 273

Metadata

Authors
Ahmad, N., Neal Schrick, F., Butcher, R. L., & Keith Inskeep, E.
Venue
Biology of Reproduction
Published
1995-05-01
Volume
52
Issue
5
Pages
1129-1135
ISSN
  • 0006-3363 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-7268
OpenAlex
W2040994414
Cited by
273
References
11
FWCI
18.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Persistent Follicles on Early Embryonic Losses in Beef Cows1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1095/biolreprod52.5.1129
The paper
Ahmad, N., Neal Schrick, F., Butcher, R. L., & Keith Inskeep, E. (1995). Effect of Persistent Follicles on Early Embryonic Losses in Beef Cows1. Biology of Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod52.5.1129

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.