Potential Role of Maternal Progesterone in the Sexual Differentiation of the Brain
Abstract
In rats, fetal testosterone directs sexual differentiation of the brain. However, fetuses are also exposed to maternal progesterone. Here we report that progestin receptor immunoreactivity in the medial preoptic nucleus (MPN) of fetal and neonatal rats is high in males but virtually absent in females. The MPN is one of the most sexually dimorphic structures in the rat brain and mediates several sexually differentiated behaviors. This suggests that progesterone may play a previously overlooked role in the development of sex differences in the brain and behavior. Henceforth, a novel function of the mother in the sexual differentiation of the CNS must be considered.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Males express more PRs than females within several hypothalamic regions on postnatal day 1 but not PN10.
“express more PRs than females within several hypothalamic regions on postnatal day (PN)1 but not PN10 [8, 9].”
From Sex-specific effects of neonatal progestin receptor antagonism on juvenile social play behavior in rats (2021) · cites this paper as [9]
The Results (p. 2) report significantly more PR-immunoreactive cells in males than females on the day of birth, but establish that difference only for the medial preoptic nucleus. The paper lists other regions containing PR-immunoreactive cells without reporting the same sex difference in them, and it does not report a PN10 comparison. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- [13]13. Altman, J Bayer, SA 1995 Atlas of Prenatal Rat Brain Development. CRC Press, Boca Raton 485.
- [14]14. Sachs, BD Meisel, RL 1994 The physiology of male sexual behavior. In: Knobil, E Neill, J (eds) The Physiology of Reproduction. Raven Press, New York, 3-75
- [15]15. Numan, M 1994 Maternal behavior. In: The Physiology of Reproduction. Knobil, E Neill, J (eds) The Physiology of Reproduction. Raven Press, New York, 223-283
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Minireview: sex differences in adult and developing brains: compensation, compensation, compensation
De Vries, G. J. (2004) · Endocrinology · doi:10.1210/en.2003-1504 · Cited by 486 · see citing works
Self-citationSakamoto, H., Ukena, K., & Tsutsui, K. (2001) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.21-16-06221.2001 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Haywood, S. A., Simonian, S. X., van der Beek, E. M., Bicknell, R. J., & Herbison, A. E. (1999) · Endocrinology · doi:10.1210/endo.140.7.6869 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Distribution of progesterone receptor immunoreactivity in the fetal and neonatal rat forebrain
Quadros, P. S., Pfau, J. L., & Wagner, C. K. (2007) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.21427 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Self-citationForbes-Lorman, R. M. (2021) · Behavioral and Brain Functions · doi:10.1186/s12993-021-00183-z · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wagner, C. K., Nakayama, A. Y., & De Vries, G. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wagner, Christine K.
- ORCID
- Wagner, Christine K.
- Venue
- Endocrinology
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 1998-08
- Volume
- 139
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3658-3661
- ISSN
- 0013-7227 (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7170
- OpenAlex
- W2083242486
- Cited by
- 111
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 2.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ScholarWorks@UMassAmherst (University of Massachusetts Amherst) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (1r03mh057237-01)
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH55562, MH57237, R01MH047538, MH47538)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
- Keywords
- maternal progesterone, sexual differentiation of the brain, progestin receptor, medial preoptic nucleus, fetal testosterone, sex differences in brain, fetal brain development, neonatal rats
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Animals, Newborn, Brain, Female, Gestational Age, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Preoptic Area, Progesterone, Receptors, Progesterone, Sex Characteristics, Sex Differentiation, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review